Search This Blog

Saturday, July 17, 2010

American Graffiti



Genre: teen drama
With: Ron Howard, Richard Dreyfuss, Paul Le Mat
Director: George Lucas
Release: 1973
Studio: Lucasfilm, Ltd., Coppola Co., Universal Pictures – Universal Pictures
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.4/10


QuickView


Story-line: one late summer night in 1962, a group of young Californians try to ward off boredom and their fears about the future by cruising around town in search of action.
Pluses: a great screenplay, well-drawn and amiable characters, a solid cast, Suzanne Somers’ mysterious presence and a seminal soundtrack.
Minuses: none.
Comments: AMERICAN GRAFFITI, hailed as a triumph for George Lucas, remains one of the best teen movies ever made. Don’t miss this atmospheric and utterly enjoyable ode to youth, simpler times and rock’n’roll. Pure movie magic!


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Serpico



Genre: police drama
Director: Sidney Lumet
Release: 1974
Studio: Artists Entertainment Complex, De Laurentiis International Manufacturing Company SpA – Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.6/10


The Hand That Wouldn’t Wash The Other


When Frank ‘Paco’ Serpico (Al Pacino), one of New York City’s finest, is rushed to the hospital after a police raid that went amiss, the news travels fast and worries many. ‘Do you think he was shot by another cop?’, asks one officer at the precinct. ‘I know six who’d love to’, answers another. But how can one cop cause such resentment among his colleagues? To find out, see Sidney Lumet’s SERPICO. With John Randolph (Sidney Green), Jack Kehoe (Tom Keough), Biff McGuire (Captain McClain), Barbara Eda-Young (Laurie), Cornelia Sharpe (Leslie Land), Tony Roberts (Bob Blair), Allan Rich (D.A. Tauber), Norman Ornellas (Don Rubello), Ed Grover (Detective Lombardo), Gene Gross (Captain Tolkin), James Tolkin (Lieutenant Steiger), Lewis J. Stadlen (Jerry Berman), John Lehne (Gilbert) and M. Emmet Walsh (Gallagher). Screenplay by Waldo Salt and Norman Wexler.

When I chose to watch SERPICO, I expected it to be a bitter pill to swallow but, in its early stages, it uses drama and humour equally effectively to depict Frank’s rookie days at the NYPD and his life as a young adult settling down on his own, meeting people and kicking up his heels. At one point – when he is assigned to the Bureau of Criminal Identification – I even wondered how this sprightly young man would become the most hated cop in the force but, sure enough, his story will take a sharp turn after his promotion to detective work and, right then and there, SERPICO morphs into a nightmarish but wholly necessary movie experience. Though less exciting than THE FRENCH CONNECTION, another film on brutal law enforcement in the Big Apple, it is more harrowing and surely more important as a social statement about police work and systemic corruption.

Although it required a sizable and competent cast, SERPICO revolves around one character and one dominant actor. As Frank, Al Pacino makes you forget how small a man he really is by projecting a huge aura that overshadows everything and everybody else. He exhibits great range and natural talent as a funny and intelligent guy whose ideas will clash mightily with those of his more conservative colleagues and who will suffer greatly because of it. Tony Roberts also shines in a minor role but, again, it’s Pacino’s bravura performance that you’ll remember most of all.

The movie’s screenplay, based on real events and a book by Peter Maas, is both complex and varied, its dramatic flow interrupted by odd occurrences and colourful dialogues that leave no room for daintiness (‘You already have one foot in the shit. Put the other one in.’). Sidney Lumet’s tight direction keeps things moving along at a brisk pace while gritty cinematography by Arthur J. Ornitz and a solid musical score by Mikis Theodorakis capture the beauty and ugliness of life in Gotham. Try as I may, I can’t find any flaws in this production.

Still not convinced? Then allow me one final pitch… my three reasons to recommend SERPICO. (1) This film weaves a powerful tale about a police force turned upside down and the whistle-blower extraordinaire who tried to right it. (2) It remains an eloquent testament to the greatness of American cinema in the 70s. (3) It features Al Pacino in one of the hottest acting streaks you could ever imagine. Think about it: from 1972 to 1975, this superb thespian starred in THE GODFATHER, SCARECROW, SERPICO, THE GODFATHER II and DOG DAY AFTERNOON. A genuine tour de force, don’t you agree?


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, July 4, 2010

American Gigolo



Genre: psychological drama
With: Richard Gere, Lauren Hutton, Hector Elizondo
Director: Paul Schrader
Release: 1980
Studio: Pierre Associates, Paramount Pictures – Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.9/10


QuickView


Story-line: handsome Julian Kay, a fixture of L.A.’s elegant set, caters to mature women as a tourist guide and gigolo. For sure, his job comes with perks aplenty, but personal safety is not one of them.
Pluses: good acting, Paul Schrader’s screenplay and direction.
Minuses: none really.
Comments: don’t be misled by AMERICAN GIGOLO’s title: it’s neither filthy nor exploitative. In fact, it’s a serious and very watchable movie. One of many milestones in Richard Gere’s career.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Wrestler (The)



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Darren Aronofsky
Release: 2008
Studio: Protozoa Pictures, Saturn Films, Wild Bunch – Fox Searchlight Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Of Hammerlocks and Has-Beens


Randy ‘The Ram’ Robinson (Mickey Rourke) sure looks bushed sitting in the locker room, his muscular body bent over and aching like that of an old man. He gave it his all in the ring that night but the wrestling card was thinly attended and his pay will hardly be worth the effort. Such is the fate of a former great athlete but Randy doesn’t mind… he still loves the sport. Rock on, brother! With Marisa Tomei (Cassidy), Evan Rachel Wood (Stephanie), Judah Friedlander (Scott Brumberg), Ajay Naidu (the medic), Wass Stevens (Nick Volpe) and Todd Barry (Wayne).

When you think about it, wrestling is a very peculiar line of work. You train hard most days and work most nights, travel incessantly, cope with injuries, abuse and humiliation, deal with risks of all kinds and put up with aggressive fans who take the sport much too seriously for their own good. Though it grants you the rarest of fringe benefits – a chance to smack your co-workers day in, day out – it comes with a downside that gets steeper and steeper as age creeps up on you and younger athletes rise in the ranks. Not that glamorous a life, eh?

Such is Randy Robinson’s predicament at the beginning of THE WRESTLER. His mind is still on fighting, his body increasingly resists it but, altogether, he is not yet ready to retire. Thus he finds himself in limbo, a weekend warrior clinging to past glory and unprepared for the big changes just around the corner. The first half-hour of THE WRESTLER depicts this side of Randy, his professional side, and you may find it boring if you’re not particularly attracted to combat sports. To its credit, this segment offers candid insights into today’s wrestling world, its quirks, tricks and outrageous use of clichés, its twisted humour and the sincere camaraderie shared by its practitioners. Later on, the film addresses Randy’s personal life which is undoubtedly more interesting. You’ll get to know the man behind the mauler and, though Randy is certainly coarse, he’s also a nice enough guy who leads a grim existence. Other than meeting a club dancer he’s particularly fond of, he is saddled with serious financial and personal problems that I should leave unexplained for now.

All of this is developed with outright competence by Darren Aronofsky and crew. THE WRESTLER boasts a fine cast led by Oscar-nominated Mickey Rourke who appears both endearing and intimidating as Randy. In the ring, he looks like a juggernaut; outside, with his raspy voice, hearing aid and glasses, he could be your next-door neighbour. Marisa Tomei delivers a gutsy performance as Cassidy and Evan Rachel Wood is utterly convincing (yet again) as Stephanie. Kudos should go to Robert Siegel for his finely structured and logical screenplay. The film’s cinematography and production values are also quite satisfying.

What more can I say? That THE WRESTLER is a treasurable sports film because it chooses realism over pompousness and honesty over corniness. In a way, it manages to transcend its subject matter to reach all among us who are growing old and who feel that society is turning its back on them. Aging is such a sad reality that you can’t blame Randy for dodging it as long as he can. Will it be steroids or Geritol?


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Madame Bovary (1991)



Genre: psychological drama
With: Isabelle Huppert, Jean-François Balmer, Christophe Malavoy
Director: Claude Chabrol
Release: 1991
Studio: MK2 International, CED Productions, FR3 Films Productions – Samuel Goldwyn Company
Rating: PG-13
MBiS score: 8.0/10


QuickView


Story-line: Emma Rouault leaves her family’s farm to marry Doctor Charles Bovary but soon finds her new life too boring to endure.
Pluses: fine acting and dialogues, a strong drama, clean production values.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: a recent film adaptation of Gustave Flaubert’s classic novel of 1857. Emma and Charles... a true tragedy.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Roger Dodger



Genre: comedy drama
Director: Dylan Kidd
Release: 2002
Studio: Artisan Entertainment
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Unlocking the Secret Code of Love


Young Nick (Jesse Eisenberg) may be naive when it comes to matters of the heart but at least he knows where to find advice. Leaving his home in Ohio, he heads for the Big Apple to talk to his uncle Roger Swanson (Campbell Scott), a publicist and man about town who has a way with words and with women (or vice versa). Nick’s education in modern love can now begin in earnest. With Isabella Rossellini (Joyce Maynard, Roger’s boss), Jennifer Beals (Sophie) and Elizabeth Berkeley (Andrea).

I’ll be brief about this one. ROGER DODGER is a wily, spunky little film that should show you a good time if you pay attention and follow the rules. Really now, how can you go wrong with a teacher like Roger? He’s a persuasive chap, an experienced lover and a keen believer in hands-on training. Always remember the basics: ‘Sex is everywhere’. And if Roger’s not your idea of a nice guy, no problem… you’ll still love how Campbell Scott plays this Lothario to a T. Same goes for the cast around him, especially Jesse Eisenberg, Jennifer Beals and Elizabeth Berkeley, if you don’t mind me saying so.

The other big star of this sparkling little feature is Dylan Kidd, who penned its nifty screenplay and did wonders as a first-time helmer. ROGER DODGER was Kidd’s baby all the way and he can certainly be proud of it. I need not comment on the movie’s production values which are very adequate indeed.

Think you can handle it now? Then do your homework! Look up ROGER DODGER and watch it attentively. In doing so, you’ll realize that its lessons apply not only to young love but also to the movie industry itself. As I’ve written before, blockbusters and big names may attract all the hoopla but it’s often unheralded productions that are the most gratifying. Give this one a try for the sake of cinema.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Death in Venice



Genre: personal drama
With: Dirk Bogarde, Silvana Mangano, Bjorn Anderssen
Director: Luchino Visconti
Release: 1971
Studio: Alfa Cinematografica Productions et al. – Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution, Dear International
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.8/10


QuickView


Story-line: while in Venice, a composer suffering from depression is fascinated by a Polish lad on holiday with his family.
Pluses: gorgeous visuals, a strong emotional charge, fabulous music by Mahler, impeccable production values.
Minuses: because of its slow pace, some viewers may not appreciate this sad and splendid movie.
Comments: Visconti’s film remains a masterpiece of beauty. Few films have managed to translate emotions into moving pictures as well as DEATH IN VENICE.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Misérables (Les) (1998)



Genre: historical drama
Director: Bille August
Release: 1998
Studio: Mandalay Pictures – TriStar Pictures
Rating: PG-13
MBiS score: 8.0/10


How Imperfect Is The Law When Laid Down By Men


LES MISÉRABLES opens in the French town of Digne circa 1795. Jean Valjean (Liam Neeson), a bitter ex-con travelling to Dijon to meet his parole officer, accepts food and lodging from the local bishop (Peter Vaughan) but chooses to flee during the night with the cleric’s silverware. The very next day, Valjean is arrested and brought back to the bishop who, instead of pressing charges, offers him a set of valuable candlesticks. Valjean is taken aback by his good fortune but the bishop remains unshaken. 'You are no longer a man of the Devil, he says to Valjean. With this silver, I have redeemed your soul.' How right (or wrong) will the bishop be? We will know in the fullness of time. With Geoffrey Rush (Javert), Uma Thurman (Fantine), Mimi Newman (Cosette at age 8), Claire Danes (Cosette), Hans Matheson (Marius Pontmercy), Christopher Adamson (Bertin), Timothy Barlow (Lafitte), David Birkin (Courfeyrac), Patsy Byrne (Toussaint), Kathleen Byron (Mother Superior), Gillian Hanna (Madame Thénardier), Shane Hervey (Gavroche), Jon Kenny (Thénardier), Reine Brynolfsson (Beauvais), James Saxon (Chabouillet) and David McKay (the informer).

The French regard Victor Hugo's novel LES MISÉRABLES as an artistic triumph and, of course, they are right. In addition to a hit show on Broadway, this eternal literary work has spawned at least six movies, Bille August's being the most recent. Without revealing too much – in truth, there is enough content in this film that I'm in no real danger of blowing it – I should add that Valjean will build a new life for himself but, in so doing, will come under the scrutiny of Javert, a policeman who had briefly known him in prison. These two and several other characters in Hugo's work – Fantine, Cosette, Marius, Gavroche – are now legendary in France and elsewhere. It's easy to figure out why: they are universal in nature and their actions raise essential questions about life and love, crime, punishment and redemption.

LES MISÉRABLES is not a flawless movie. It lacks a certain French touch with its international cast using British accents but remains a valid and very entertaining feature. The acting here is top-notch, highlighted by strong turns from well-known names. Liam Neeson is praiseworthy as Valjean, a quiet and basically good man who, unlike SWEENEY TODD, will try to move on after an unfortunate start in life. As for Geoffrey Rush, you will love his performance but despise his Javert, that obsessive, overzealous snoop who sees Valjean's arrest as a career achievement. Uma Thurman delivers a fine Fantine, a character subjected to the same opprobrium that Valjean endured in his times of misery. Clare Danes and Hans Matheson also shine for the young generation.

Technically speaking, LES MISÉRABLES cannot be faulted. Cinematography, costumes, set design and period detail complement the narrative very efficiently and, while the film's pacing may feel a bit sluggish at first, it picks up considerably as the drama unfolds. Due credit must be given to Bille August for his sober direction and to Basil Poledouris for his competent musical score, especially his theme for oboe. What bothered me was a noticeable omission (or cut) in the script. While Valjean was never charged for the Digne incident, you will hear Javert claiming more than once that he is a convict and a wanted man. But how can that be? The movie doesn't explain. In fact, Javert's ranting became such an annoyance for me that I did some research after seeing the movie to find out if I had missed something. From what I gathered, Valjean did not change his ways immediately after his encounter with the bishop. While still in Digne, he stole a piece of silver from a little boy and then decided to give it back… but couldn't because the theft had already been reported. Thus he was considered in breach of his parole… and Javert's claim was legally well-founded. Keep this in mind when you watch the film and everything will fit a lot better… I want you to be clear-headed and on your toes when that dynamite ending comes along.

Frankly, this is all you need to know. As an entertainment vehicle, August's work reminded me of those great Saturday afternoons I used to spend at the Palace theatre when I was young… hmmm… younger. They used to show grand old swashbucklers and epic films that would take you on a roller coaster of emotions and keep you on the edge of your seat. This is what you'll get with LES MISÉRABLES, so sit tight and leave your problems behind for a couple of hours. Yes, this is what cinema is all about.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, June 7, 2010

Dolce Vita (La)



English title: The Sweet Life
Genre: slice-of-life drama
With: Marcello Mastroianni, Anouk Aimée, Yvonne Furneaux
Director: Federico Fellini
Release: 1960
Studio: Riama Film, Pathé Image, Gray Films – American International Pictures, Macmillan Audio Brandon
Rating: -
MBiS score: 9.2/10


QuickView


Story-line: LA DOLCE VITA recounts a few tumultuous days in the life of Marcello, an Italian gossip columnist who pays dearly for his every glimpse of glamour.
Pluses: superb acting and direction, magnificent symbolism, striking imagery and Anita Ekberg’s famous romp in a Roman fountain.
Minuses: if you expect high action and a continuous, all-embracing story, you won’t savour this ironic movie to the full. Fellini’s masterpiece is an episodic, meticulous and slightly dry watch.
Comments: LA DOLCE VITA is one of the biggies in the film universe – not only for its pioneering use of the term ‘paparazzi’ but also for its imagery – and all movie buffs should see it one day or another. A unique motion picture experience and a classic among classics.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street



Genre: musical drama
Director: Tim Burton
Release: 2007
Studio: DreamWorks, Warner Bros. Pictures, Neal Street Productions et al. – DreamWorks, Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Love That Bleeding In My Hand (sorry about that, Elton John!)


As their boat arrives in London one quiet night in 1802 (or is it 1840?), two men reflect on what the City means to them. The younger man, Anthony Hope (Jamie Campbell Bower), claims that London outshines all other splendours on Earth but his older mate, Sweeney Todd (Johnny Depp), compares it to a huge hole in which vermin scuttle about under the contemptuous gaze of a privileged class. Clearly, young Anthony sees life with the eyes of a romantic while Sweeney’s view is tainted by bitterness. But why such anger, may you ask? Because of a barber named Barker, fifteen years before. With Helena Bonham Carter (Mrs. Lovett), Sacha Baron Cohen (Signor Adolfo Pirelli), Alan Rickman (Turpin), Timothy Spall (Beadle Bamford), Jayne Wisener (Johanna), Laura Michelle Kelly (the Beggar Woman) and Ed Sanders (Tobias Ragg).

Tim Burton’s vivid imagination and seamless direction work wonders in this gothic and gory film based on Stephen Sondheim's Broadway hit. His gift for shadows, outrageous characters and cockroach jokes imbues every frame along with gorgeous, quasi-black and white cinematography and dazzling special effects. Burton’s vision is very dark, emulating Sweeney’s psychological bent, and the rivers of blood his barber-butcher draws from unsuspecting clients seem utterly psychedelic in dimmed lighting. This film is assuredly colourless but the action it depicts is colourful indeed, dramatic at times and a tad humourous also. Art design, makeup and far-out costumes heighten the tragic and comic aspects of the story. Visually and stylistically speaking, SWEENEY TODD is a magical, surreal and riveting experience about a man who has escaped a prison only to slip into another.

Your ears will also be contented with the atmospheric music and imaginative songs that carry Sweeney’s gruesome story. Some of these songs are sweet and funny, others are very sinister but all are well written and performed. The cast digs into them with abandon, exhibiting more than average talent; Johnny Depp sings with a threatening growl that befits his tortured character while Helena Bonham Carter tears through long stretches without catching her breath. It is on stuff like this that Broadway has built its lasting reputation. Throughout the movie, sound effects and soundscapes are thunderous.

SWEENEY TODD’s power is also evident in its acting. I can only admire Johnny Depp for his intensity and versatility; he cuts a fine and menacing figure with his arm thrust into the air, hand holding the blade of vengeance. Helena Bonham Carter is equally fabulous, and not only for her getups, thick makeup and crazy hairdo. Let’s face it, these two make a smashing couple from hell. Alan Rickman, always a delectable villain, manages to shine even though his character seems unidimensional; I would have liked to know what inner demon drove Turpin to unadulterated meanness. In a similar register, Sacha Baron Cohen’s clear knack for drama and accents caught me completely off guard. Is Sacha possessed by Peter Sellers’ ghost? Possibly, methinks. As for the other characters, they are mostly eclipsed by the abovementioned four and, though I have no intention of disparaging this or that one, I felt that Anthony and Johanna were a bit bland by comparison while Beadle Bamford is a caricature as the sidekick with a gimmick, a cane reminiscent of Al Pacino’s in SCENT OF A WOMAN.

If there is a weak link in this expertly rendered movie, I do believe it is the story-line itself – though the same could be said of many musicals on stage or on screen. Warning – spoilers ahead! Basically, SWEENEY TODD is a standard revenger story (think Monte Cristo) recounted in over-the-top operatic form. It relies on a few strong coincidences conveniently linking all characters and some of its narrative elements are not entirely valid. (1) In an important scene, the young and beautiful Johanna, Turpin’s captive and Anthony’s budding love interest, throws a key to our lad from her bedroom window while the jealous Turpin, watching her from a keyhole, chooses not to intervene. Logically, you’d expect a stiffer reaction from this ogre of a man if you consider how he repelled Anthony in an earlier encounter; in his place, at the very least, I would have barged into the room to scold Johanna and threaten Anthony from the window. While we’re at it, how did Johanna ever get her hands on a house key with a monster like Turpin hovering around her? (2) If you adhere to the story, Sweeney should be at least fourteen years older than Pirelli but, notwithstanding Sweeney’s lock of white hair, I never felt that the age difference was that wide on screen. (3) Tobias’ fond reminiscences about Pirelli seem exaggerated when you consider how the Italian barber mistreated him; similarly, the boy’s initial suspicions about Sweeney are not really explained. (4) I had difficulty believing that a vulnerable little boy like Tobias would commit the final act of violence in the story but, of course, it had to be committed by one of the characters and there weren’t many left at that point. I’ll admit that the youngster had stated earlier that he would do anything for Mrs. Lovett… but he had also suggested calling the police. Why, then, did he take matters into his own hands? For his sake, we’ll simply assume that he was driven by his will to survive… or poisoned by all those pies he ate. (5) Lastly, the movie is somewhat disingenuous about the message it wants to convey. By counterbalancing an ironic and morally acceptable conclusion with several detailed depictions of the same slaughterous act, it manages to trivialize (or even glorify) violence by hinting that slitting throats may be horrendous but is also very cool. Personally, I don’t consider myself an innocent and I don’t object to multiple deaths in a work of art but, if you compare this production with Franco Zeffirelli’s HAMLET for example, you’ll see how better things can be when less emphasis is put on bloodshed. For all these reasons, I cannot give SWEENEY TODD as high a mark as I would have liked but, in its present state, it does remain a solid film.

Enough said! I’m sure you get the picture… and you may readily see it. Just don’t take it too seriously. It’s not worth busting an artery the next time you see a razor.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved