Search This Blog

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Snapper (The)



Genre: family comedy
With: Colm Meaney, Tina Kellegher, Ruth McCabe
Director: Stephen Frears
Release: 1993
Studio: BBC Films, Distant Horizon Corporation
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.1/10


QuickView


Story-line: all hell breaks loose in the Curley household when word gets out that young Sharon is pregnant.
Pluses: fabulous acting (especially by Colm Meany as Dessie, Sharon’s father), a really funny story written by Roddy Doyle, unerring direction, a lively pace.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: successful comedies are not that abundant in moviedom and this tight little film set in Dublin is one to be treasured. Sit back and enjoy, cinephiles, you deserve it.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Dogville



Genre: psychosocial drama
Director: Lars von Trier
Release: 2003
Studio: Arte France Cinéma, ARTE, YLE, Lionsgate Films et al.
*Quote inspired by The ‘60s – Decade of Tumult and Change, a special issue of LIFE magazine dated Dec. 26, 1969.
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.1/10



‘When she yelps, it’s not a sign of pain, it’s a sign of joy.*’


The Depression has been raging for some time now and the people of Dogville, a hamlet in the Rockies, have gotten used to humble living and isolation. Nevertheless, when gunshots resonate one night and a pretty young stranger named Grace (Nicole Kidman) is found wandering in the streets, Tom Edison Jr. (Paul Bettany), the local philosopher, takes it upon himself to help her out. With John Hurt (the narrator), Lauren Bacall (Ma Ginger), Patricia Clarkson (Vera), Stellan Skarsgard (Chuck, Vera’s husband), Ben Gazzara (Jack McKay), Philip Baker Hall (Tom Edison Sr.), Zeljko Ivanek (Ben), Chloë Sevigny (Liz Henson) and James Caan (the man in the car).

---

In 1964, when animal lovers chastised President Lyndon Johnson for pulling his beagles by the ears during a social gathering, LBJ answered that his pets loved it. Johnson’s reply – paraphrased above – eloquently reflects my mood after seeing DOGVILLE. It’s undoubtedly a solid and challenging film… but does it ever sting!

At first, I found DOGVILLE a bit confusing since it was produced with starkly limited means and without formal decor; all of its scenes were shot indoors under artificial lighting and with scant perspective, the set being surrounded by a white or flat black background. Moreover, the town’s buildings being represented only by rudimentary structures and white marks on the studio floor, characters were required to mime routine actions (entrances and exits, for example) and deprived of the most basic intimacy. Given these visual and creative constraints, you may need some time to adjust to the hamlet’s closed-in universe and Lars von Trier’s film, already longish at nearly three hours, appears achingly slow in its first half. Fortunately, the movie’s dramatic flow tightens up considerably afterwards and its awkward set-up, far from being a simple gimmick, truly mirrors the dilemma Grace’s presence forces on the townspeople.

But what sort of a beast is DOGVILLE, may you ask? Essentially a cross between fable and surrealist theatre, a cringeworthy meditation on fear, ignorance and oppression. This is not feel-good fare, not by a long shot, but high-impact cinema that slowly reveals its true nature and leaves you shuddering long after you’ve heard its important closing song. Its stiff political message will not be appreciated by all viewers but its power cannot be easily dismissed.

Even though DOGVILLE involved very little in terms of production values, it never feels cheap or unprofessional and its strong cast doesn’t disappoint. Nicole Kidman delivers a marvellous performance as the stranger who is tested again and again while John Hurt’s stylishly written narration adds to the tragedy conveyed on screen; I also liked Ben Gazzara and Paul Bettany, whose character bears a name both symbolic and ominous. The film’s subjects are often captured in tight close-up, as was the case in BREAKING THE WAVES, von Trier’s luminous work from 1996.

That’s about as far as I’ll go for now and, notwithstanding my recommendation, I must advise you that DOGVILLE is not a film for all tastes. It’s certainly a brave statement and a stunning work by an inventive European filmmaker… but be aware that it edifies and horrifies in equal measure.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Raise the Red Lantern



Also known as: Da hong deng long gao gao gua
Genre: psychological drama
With: Gong Li, He Caifei, Cao Cuifeng
Director: Zhang Yimou
Release: 1991
Studio: Era International, Salon Productions, China Film Co-production Corporation – Orion Classics
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.5/10


QuickView


Story-line: after accepting to marry a rich Chinese master, nineteen-year-old Songlian moves to his mansion… to live with his three other wives.
Pluses: beautiful visuals and costumes, impeccable acting, remarkable direction and a strong story about household politics.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: this brutal Chinese film set in the 20s showcases Zhang Yimou’s world-class talent as a director and Gong Li’s fearsome acting chops. No doubt about it, this picture is a biggie.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Genou de Claire (Le)



English title: Claire’s Knee
Genre: psychological comedy
Director: Éric Rohmer
Release: 1970
Studio: Les Films du Losange
Background material on Éric Rohmer: bloomberg.net
Rating: –
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Dietrich Was Right… You Can Be Both An Intellectual And A Pervert


In the late 70s and early 80s, one of the best comedies on TV was BARNEY MILLER, which featured a squad of NYPD detectives and the cases they were assigned to solve. Though its stories almost exclusively took place in one cramped and dingy precinct office and were based on personal interaction between its regular characters, I never found it boring. Among the cops, my favourite was Arthur Dietrich, the conspicuously clever one who often got on his colleagues’ nerves. The title of this review refers to one episode in which a woman had laid indecency charges against a college professor and the prof had protested to Dietrich that he was a ‘scholar’. Dietrich’s retort, as hinted above, was less than supportive for the alleged offender.

LE GENOU DE CLAIRE is our first foray into the late Éric Rohmer’s film universe and, if you’ve heard about him, you’ll understand my reference to BARNEY MILLER. In a typical Rohmer, sets are of little importance, dialogues drive the plot much more than concrete action and story-lines feed on character psychology and personal interaction. Overall, this director kept his dramas light and his comedies refined, thus authoring films that some people will find tediously genteel but others quite wise and rewarding. Among the handful I have seen, my top choice remains MA NUIT CHEZ MAUD but the perverse LE GENOU DE CLAIRE is a fine introduction to Rohmer’s original style of moviemaking.

Generally speaking, LE GENOU DE CLAIRE goes like this. Jérôme (Jean-Claude Brialy), a French diplomat posted in Sweden, returns to his homeland to settle personal matters. In the process, he hitches up with Aurora (Aurora Cornu), a novelist and dear friend, who introduces him to Mrs. Walter (Michèle Montel) and her family. Feelings of love will soon be revealed… in addition to an ardent, unsettling attraction that should be left unexplained for now.

In this dryly funny picture, what stands out is the rapport between Aurora and Jérôme who discuss and analyze his obsession (?) as if they were psychiatrist and patient. To some, their tête-à-têtes will probably seem static and stilted but, to art film fans and francophiles in particular, they serve as a dandy illustration of that legendary Gallic sense for argumentation… and a mighty peculiar way to tickle the viewer. While you sit there, privy to all of that pensiveness, poetry and plotting, you really wonder where it will all lead you. Better yet, you’ll find yourself entangled in one of those small-scale mysteries that Rohmer relished so much and recounted on screen with intriguing and even mesmerizing results.

If you like your acting flamboyant and noisy, you will be disappointed with LE GENOU DE CLAIRE. Such a quiet film required restraint from its cast, which is exactly what it got from the trio above and also from Béatrice Romand, Gérard Falconetti, Laurence de Monaghan and Fabrice Luchini; however, since the story revolves around Jérôme, expect to see a lot of Jean-Claude Brialy who is brilliant as an earnest-looking but shifty fellow. Production values are satisfying and sober. As for Rohmer’s direction and writing, I see no reason to complain; when I think of many recent movies that have been hyped as great works but are really defective or worthless, I can only admire a creator capable of turning trivial-seeming events into appealing little stories so attuned to our human condition. Such is the miracle of cinema and I can testify to its power.

Has my review been fair enough? I do hope so and, since we’re friends, I won’t hold it against you if you choose not to see this film. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly recommend LE GENOU DE CLAIRE to anyone who loves logical comedies and polished entertainment. I’ll admit that Rohmer’s brand of filmmaking is an acquired taste but it’s a taste no one can acquire without starting somewhere. Here’s to Jean-Marie Maurice Schérer (1920-2010), a pioneer of the French ‘new wave’ and a director François Truffaut respectfully called ‘our master’.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Do the Right Thing



Genre: social drama
With: Spike Lee, Danny Aiello, Ossie Davis
Director: Spike Lee
Release: 1989
Studio: Sound One, Deluxe Digital Media, 40 Acres & A Mule Filmworks, Da Moulan Van Movie Company
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.2/10


QuickView


Story-line: one hot day in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of New York City, Sal’s Famous Pizzeria becomes the focal point of neighbourhood tensions.
Pluses: strong acting, excellent character development, a foreboding mood and a realistic story.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: a mature and excellent work about race relations and a great effort by writer-director-actor Spike Lee. DO THE RIGHT THING can truly be called a ‘slice-of-life’ film.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Clockwork Orange (A)



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Release: 1971
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures, Kinney Company, Polaris Productions, Hawks Films Limited – Warner Bros. Pictures International
Song lyrics: Mick Jagger and Keith Richards (1968)
Rating: R
MBiS score: 9.1/10


Sympathy For The Devil


Those young men sipping drinks at the Korova Milkbar are no ordinary patrons. They call themselves the Droogs – a raucous gang of hooligans led by one Alex DeLarge (Malcolm McDowell) – and they don’t intend to loaf about all evening. When good and ready, they’ll surely prowl the city’s dark corners looking for kicks and, by Jove, there will be kicks to be had! With Warren Clarke (Dim the Droog), James Marcus (Georgie the Droog), Michael Tarn (Pete the Droog), Patrick Magee (Mr. Alexander), Michael Bates (Barnes), John Clive (Stage Actor), Adrienne Corri (Mrs. Alexander), Carl Duering (Brodsky), Paul Farrell (Tramp) and Clive Francis (Joe). Production team: Bill Butler (editor), Russell Hagg and Peter Sheilds (art directors), John Barry (production designer), Ron Beck (wardrobe supervisor), Milena Canonero (costume designer) and Walter (Wendy) Carlos (music, interpreting compositions by Beethoven, Rossini, Elgar and others).

When the Beatles and the Rolling Stones reached superstardom in the mid-60s, a few years before A CLOCKWORK ORANGE was released, their songs and musical directions divided young fans and adults alike. If you loved pop rock transcendence and beautiful harmonies, the Beatles were your band and your folks didn’t complain much. If raw blues rock, sexual suggestiveness and a whiff of danger were your bag, you idolized the Stones but mom and pop cringed. One could argue that the same dichotomy holds true for movie masterpieces. Most are rooted in noble symbolism or portray man’s primary struggles on Earth but Stanley Kubrick’s classic about Alex and his ruffians stands out like a black sheep among the flock, a deleterious work conceived by rough-and-tumble souls. In spirit, it owes little to the Beatles but shares plenty with SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL, the Stones’ scary hit from 1968.

Please allow me to introduce myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste


Early on, the level of violence in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE may shock you as the Droogs, who give little credence to social conventions, let their boots, fists and knives do the talking for them. If you consider these scenes repulsive or sadistic – as they obviously are – keep in mind that the mayhem lasts only fifteen minutes or so and is tempered with a peculiar brand of sick and witty humour. Hang on to your bowlers, mates!

But what's puzzling you
Is the nature of my game


Once this intemperate introduction has passed, Kubrick’s film slows down to focus on Alex, his private life and delinquency problems. In this context, our devilish dandy appears less like a monster and more like a prototypical anti-hero. The lad shows intellectual curiosity, a love for classical music and mammoth mojo (!).

Killed the Czar and his ministers
Anastasia screamed in vain


After another flurry of gratuitous violence, the movie changes gears with Alex becoming the hero – quite literally – of a contemporary fable alternately hilarious and creepy. From there, the film’s story-line mixes nightmarish terror, devastating humour, a hard satirical bent on politics and society (a recurrent theme in Kubrick’s oeuvre) and joyful irreverence towards religion and authority. Deep down, its Orwellian message about crime and punishment, political expediency, science and ethical issues will appear bracingly serious and its verdict, surprisingly moral. That’s as far as I’ll go for now but, if you’re anything like me, you will come to accept young Alex… and even root for the roguish bugger!

Just call me Lucifer
'Cause I'm in need of some restraint


A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is certainly not Satan’s handiwork but it remains diabolically clever – pun intended, of course. Taking their cue from an Anthony Burgess novel, Kubrick and his magnificent team fashioned not just a dirty allegory but a blowout for the senses. Jazzed-up dialogues (the Droogs speak their own crazy lingo), bizarre costumes, mind-blowing sets leaning on the ultra-modern and decked out in psychedelic colours (fuchsia and lime green!) and a souped-up musical score fusing synthesizers and old-world compositions collectively establish a surreal mood that prefigures some of EYES WIDE SHUT’s stranger moments. Between you and me, I have long thought that Stanley Kubrick was an Englishman and this film reinforces the illusion. Moreover, his in-your-face demonstrations of erotica and sexual mischief are remarkably adroit – most other filmmakers would look juvenile if they tried this kind of stuff but he manages to pull it off with unrepentant glee. Scenes that would be innocuous or drab in other movies look funny and even grotesque in Kubrick's offbeat vision of the world.

So if you meet me
Have some courtesy
Have some sympathy, have some taste


Acting-wise, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is mainly Malcolm McDowell’s show and he delivers a masterful performance in an unglamorous role. His mellifluous voice and very British accent are immediately captivating while his playing runs the gamut of emotions, from evil playfulness to unforced civility. A competent cast affords him noteworthy support in a variety of roles, some good, some nasty indeed.

Use all your well-learned politesse
Or I'll lay your soul to waste, mmm yeah


I’ll sum up with an easy riddle – and feel free to interrupt me if you know the answer (!). What do you get when you mix Kubrick and Burgess, genius and madness, an electrifying story and a form of intellectual perversion rarely seen in modern culture? A very subversive movie and, better yet, an outrageous piece of cinema that shames many of today’s so-called ‘masterpieces’. Speak of the devil!


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Best Intentions (The)



Genre: relationship drama
With: Pernilla August, Samuel Fröler, Max von Sydow
Director: Bille August
Release: 1992
Studio: STV1 Drama, ZDF, Channel 4, RAIDUE, La Sept, DR, YLE 2, NRK, RUV
Rating: -
MBiS score: 8.4/10


QuickView


Story-line: when Henryk Bergman, a stern young Swede studying to become a pastor, visits his friend Ernst Akerblom and meets Ernst’s sister Anna, you can feel that love is in the air… but a love that will be faced with tremendous obstacles.
Pluses: a serious and moving story, striking characters, seamless direction and impressive acting.
Minuses: the film’s length (3 hours) may scare off some but, really, do try to see this splendid, thoughtful feature.
Comments: this movie about Ingmar Bergman’s star-crossed parents is a true representation of life’s plain and sombre struggles. Pure cinema in its most useful, artful form.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Lost In Translation



Genre: comedy drama
Director: Sofia Coppola
Release: 2003
Studio: American Zoetrope, Elemental Films, Focus Features
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.3/10


A Kiss is Just a Kiss (thank you, Louis Armstrong)


Bob Harris (Bill Murray), a washed up American actor who appears in TV ads to fend off irrelevance, finds himself in Tokyo one day to shoot a commercial for Suntory whisky. Jet-lagged, distracted and groggy, he is visibly bored despite the attention he receives as a celebrity guest. Things will change, however, when he unexpectedly meets Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson), a young compatriot with problems of her own. With Giovanni Ribisi (John), Anna Faris (Kelly) and Catherine Lambert (the jazz singer).

Some movies are more difficult to fathom than others and LOST IN TRANSLATION is one such film. Neither loud nor busy, it deals in emotions and lets them evolve at a natural pace, truly reflecting life as you and I live it. For this reason, don’t expect big laughs or gut-wrenching action from this film but subtle comedy, light drama and a pleasantly disorienting mood. In her screenplay, Sofia Coppola chose to practise empathy and I don’t see how else she could have depicted her two travellers stranded in a foreign land, struggling to understand their surroundings and what is happening to them. When you go abroad, especially in a country with a culture vastly different from yours, the need to confide in someone you trust is a strong and natural reaction that both Bob and Charlotte will act upon with complete candour.

Technically speaking, LOST IN TRANSLATION remains true to its purpose. It genuinely cares for its characters and shows them for what they are, without fanfare nor pretense. Bill Murray was given a role perfectly suited to him and Scarlett Johansson played hers with justifiable restraint as a young woman searching for the key to her future. The age difference between Bob and Charlotte may – or may not – matter in the story. By comparison, other characters are relegated to bit parts while the real support comes from Japan’s capital, fabulous and iridescent, awesome but never hostile, a city brimming with movement and friendly people; the camera clearly adores Tokyo’s vistas and captures them with elegance. As for Ms. Coppola’s direction, it carries the narrative smoothly and competently.

However, all this beauty and sympathy comes at a cost and LOST IN TRANSLATION suffers from a lack of content that may leave you unfulfilled. I cannot help comparing it with BROKEN FLOWERS, another vehicle for Bill Murray’s deadpan best, which wasn’t a powerhouse either but managed to get the viewer a little more involved than this one. As sensitive a movie as Ms. Coppola’s can be, it remains slight and feels at times like a travelogue. The film’s denouement, also, can hardly be called a climax.

I know that many in moviedom have expressed admiration for LOST IN TRANSLATION but, in life as in matters of motion picture entertainment, it never hurts to be choosy. You may watch this film if you want to – it’s agreeable all right – but I wouldn’t call it essential viewing. As George Borrow once said, ‘Translation is at best an echo.’ Sorry.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

1900



Also known as: Novecento
Genre: social epic
With: Robert De Niro, Dominique Sanda, Gérard Depardieu
Director: Bernardo Bertolucci
Release: 1976
Studio: Artistes Associés, Produzioni Europee Associates, Artemis Film
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.4/10


QuickView


Story-line: while focusing on Alfredo and Olmo, two men born in 1900 on opposite sides of the social divide, this sprawling film depicts nearly 50 years on an Italian farm where owners and peasant workers struggle together, clash often and witness some of the 20th century’s most important events.
Pluses: a formidable cast including Burt Lancaster and Donald Sutherland (as a demented foreman), expert direction, a sweeping narrative.
Minuses: the movie’s two versions are decidedly long (4 and 5 hours) but, as incredible as it may seem, they remain interesting throughout. Some scenes may be difficult to stomach because of their shock value.
Comments: 1900 is a monumental work by one of the world’s most reputable directors and also a fine product of Italian cinema. A worthwhile watch for movie buffs!


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Feux rouges



English title: Red Lights
Genre: thriller
Director: Cédric Kahn
Release: 2004
Studio: France 3 Cinéma, Centre National du Cinéma, Banque Populaire Images 4, Cofimages, Alicéleo, Gimages, Gimages 6, Wellspring Media
Rating: -
MBiS score: 8.3/10


I’m Always Nervous When You Drive


On this last day before the summer holidays, pandemonium has spread throughout Paris but Antoine (Jean-Pierre Darroussin), an insurance man, savours the moment with contrasting serenity. This year, he has set himself up to enjoy his precious time off and, as he emails his wife Hélène (Carole Bouquet) before leaving the office, his mood is almost poetic. ‘I feel like a man in love going on his first date, he writes to his better half, and I’m happy we’ll join the children and visit your parents.’ Sounds like a great vacation… but don’t bet on it. Merely three hours later, as Antoine takes to the road with his belle Hélène, he seems aggravated, even impatient, and the couple’s carefree drive down south turns into a battle of wills. With Carline Paul, Jean-Pierre Gos and Vincent Deniard. Music by Arvo Pärt.

FEUX ROUGES wastes no time in making a mundane premise look odd and even unsettling. Its stunning opening theme by Claude Debussy and a few shots of futuristic high-rises put you on notice that something unusual – and indeed remarkable – is in the offing. Hélène didn’t see it coming but minor annoyances have irritated her hubby. The ensuing spat gets ugly as quarrels often do… but to see it become a chilling, small-scale thriller is a feat we can only attribute to Georges Simenon, the novelist behind the famous Maigret series, and director Cédric Kahn, who expertly adapted his story for the big screen.

There are few characters in FEUX ROUGES and, frankly, there was no need for more. Jean-Pierre Darroussin does a bang-up job as Antoine, a basically agreeable fellow who blows a fuse and allows himself to vent his pent-up emotions (for reasons I shan’t disclose). In this regard, the movie’s story-line makes excellent use of the humongous traffic jams that clog up the French capital every year at vacation time. Carole Bouquet, as usual, doesn’t content herself with playing a pretty face; her Hélène is a strong, intelligent woman who won’t stand for churlishness. Whether together or apart, these two actors deserve your undivided attention.

Polished dialogues, a competent supporting cast and a cunning screenplay will do the rest. Technicals don’t disappoint either, cinematography especially. My only concern about FEUX ROUGES − and a legitimate one since thrillers sometimes veer off atrociously after a solid start − was its staying power. For the record, let’s just say that Kahn’s film grips the pavement like trusty Michelins and that, no matter how finicky you are about plot lines, you will be fully satisfied with what you see. Some elements of the story may be left unexplained but you’ll find answers for every twist and turn.

I won’t say more and, honestly, I don’t need to. Don’t miss FEUX ROUGES, a superb little feature about the fickleness of human nature, life’s many surprises and a very unusual case of road rage. And if one day you find yourself in a car with a driver who’s hot under the collar, don’t argue.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Glass Menagerie (The)



Genre: family drama
With: Joanne Woodward, Karen Allen, John Malkovich
Director: Paul Newman
Release: 1987
Studio: Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group, Aspetuck Productions Ltd – Cineplex Odeon Films, Sony Pictures Releasing International (SPRI)
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.4/10


QuickView


Story-line: in St. Louis, during the Depression, the tenuous relationship between an overbearing mother (Amanda), her restless son bent on adventure (Tom) and her hapless and slightly handicapped daughter (Laura) reaches a breaking point.
Pluses: splendid acting, a moving story by Tennessee Williams, respectful direction by Paul Newman.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: though fundamentally a stage play, THE GLASS MENAGERIE works admirably on the big screen and stands as a fine character study. Don’t miss this heartbreaking film, if only to meet Laura and learn of her real predicament: ‘Mother's afraid I'm going to be an old maid.’


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Reader (The)



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Stephen Daldry
Release: 2008
Studio: The Weinstein Company, Mirage Enterprises, Neunte Babelsberg Film GmbH – Miramax Films, The Weinstein Company
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.3/10


The Sting of a First Love Too Powerful and Guilty


Berlin, 1958. As Hanna Schmitz (Kate Winslet) was washing the sidewalk in front of her building, she noticed a sick lad hovering about and urged him to come up to her apartment for immediate care. While they were together, the boy, one Michael Berg (David Kross), could plainly see that Hanna was not as privileged as he was and their 20-year age difference was clearly understood but the encounter, as brief as it was, left an impression that would prove impossible to quell. With Ralph Fiennes (Michael Berg as an adult), Karoline Herfurth (Marthe), Hannah Herzsprung (Julia), Bruno Ganz (Professor Rohl) and Lena Olin. Music by Nico Muhly.

From what I have told you thus far, THE READER may seem like a standard ‘young man meets mature woman’ love story born of mushy feelings and headed for predictable ruin but, in truth, it encompasses much more. Michael and Hanna’s rocky relationship will conjoin past, present and future as well as conscience, class and culture in ways they would never have suspected when they first set eyes on each other. At the very least, you should know that their chance meeting will open up large-scale issues in addition to personal ones and, in this regard, Stephen Daldry’s film can be likened to CACHÉ, another feature about private matters inescapably linked to the big picture of life.

Since THE READER tells its story from a literary angle and begins with a flash forward to 1995, it needs time to unfold, establish its main characters and shake off an obvious, all-too-perfect premise. Nevertheless, it quietly draws you in from the outset – like the first pages of a book usually hint at greater things to come – until it reaches that pivotal moment when Michael and Hanna each face moral issues as painful as they are intractable. All of this is handled expertly by director Daldry and writer David Hare, working from a novel by Bernhard Schlink. Acting-wise, Kate Winslet serves up a restrained and reasoned performance as Hanna, a moody and impatient woman to whom life offers little consolation aside from a young lover, while David Kross plays a bright, slightly rebellious Michael. Notice how these two characters, though different in personality and background, will react similarly to the tragedy that befalls them. Ralph Fiennes, as the older, colder Michael, shows his usual talent but spends much less time on screen than movie posters and studio publicity may indicate. The other actors on board, especially Bruno Ganz and Lena Olin, are also above reproach. I see no reason to complain about production values, cinematography or editing; visuals, in particular, are crisp and aesthetic.

Since books are so important to Michael, there is one scene in THE READER that I found very revealing and I hope it will strike you as well. It’s the one where a teacher theorizes that ‘The notion of secrecy is central to western literature’. With due respect, I can’t say that I agree entirely with him but THE READER certainly proves his point with eloquence and surprising emotional force. May you profit from this lesson in life and culture as much as I did.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, August 30, 2010

Hussard sur le toit (Le)



English title: Horseman on the Roof (The)
Genre: period epic
With: Olivier Martinez, Juliette Binoche, Jean Yanne
Director: Jean-Paul Rappeneau
Release: 1995
Studio: Hachette Première – Miramax Zoe
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.1/10


QuickView


Story-line: in 1832, an Italian colonel exiled in southern France tries to return home despite enemy agents, a cholera epidemic and a lady in distress.
Pluses: a well-founded story based on a Jean Giono novel, fine period detail, quality acting and Juliette Binoche’s undeniable star power.
Minuses: none, except one gruesome scene involving a corpse.
Comments: if you ache for drama, adventure and romance (yes, that too!), LE HUSSARD SUR LE TOIT will cure what ails you. Let it take you to another time, another place, another world altogether.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Changeling (The)



Genre: personal drama
Director: Clint Eastwood
Release: 2008
Studio: Imagine Entertainment, Malpaso Productions, Relativity Media – Universal Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


A Mother Should Know


Lincoln Heights (Los Angeles), 1928. Although she had promised to take her ten-year-old son Walter (Gattlin Griffith) to the movies, Christine Collins (Angelina Jolie) simply couldn’t refuse an extra work shift at Pacific Telephone and Telegraph. It was one of those split-second choices a single mom must make between career and family but, at least, Christine had figured she’d be home early enough to take Walter to the movie house. Unfortunately, fate decided otherwise and, when Christine returned from work, her son was nowhere to be found. This mother’s ordeal had only begun. With John Malkovich (Gustav Briegleb), Jeffrey Donovan (J.J. Jones), Amy Ryan (Carol Dexter), Frank Wood (Ben Harris), Colm Feore (James E. Davis), Reed Birney (Mayor Cryer), Geoffrey Pierson (S.S. Hahn), Michael Kelly (Ybarra), Denis O'Hare (Dr. Steele), Jason Butler Harner (Gordon Northcott), Peter Gerety (Tarr) and Ric Sarabia (Man at Diner).

In its first few sequences, THE CHANGELING telegraphs one of its essential themes – during a conversation between Christine and her son – but also tries to mislead by showing happy-go-lucky images that belie the horrors yet to come. Judging by those sequences only, you could easily infer that single parents are a very happy lot. One scene, in particular, epitomizes this ham-fisted and unrealistic set-up, the one where Christine enters her son’s room to wake him up for breakfast. The moment feels idyllic and, instead of trudging in (or darting in) like any busy mom would do, Angelina Jolie prances about, her clothes billowing as if she was modeling the latest Dior on a Paris runway. Right then, I wondered if THE CHANGELING would pain me as much as MILLION DOLLAR BABY did but, luckily for me and happily for Clint Eastwood, it didn’t. It slowly gained momentum after that and, once Christine gets caught in a political tug-of-war that may very well destroy her, I was hooked and ready to go. At the finish, THE CHANGELING stands as a changed movie, a suspenseful and punishing film that will remind you of CHINATOWN not only for its locale and spare trumpet melodies (composed by Eastwood himself) but also for its atmosphere of degradation and corruption in a city reputed to be an earthly paradise.

The same comments hold true for the acting, which looks better and better as the movie develops. In all fairness, Angelina Jolie deserves praise for her performance despite my earlier criticism; one should not call her to account for decisions made by others. As Christine, a character not unlike Mariane Pearl in A MIGHTY HEART, Ms. Jolie shows strength as well as vulnerability... and don't doubt my word for it. The other cast members, portraying a splendid assortment of goodies and baddies, play with much the same conviction, especially Jeffrey Donovan, Amy Ryan and John Malkovich. The difficulty here is not finding well-played characters but identifying those who can be trusted; none of them seems evil at first glance but some will commit truly odious acts in the name of malice or power.

Visually, THE CHANGELING is an attractive film even though some of its locations are grim indeed. Production values and period detail are top-line; I won’t easily forget the film’s Roaring 20s feel, its art deco sets, Walter’s radio and those roaming supervisors. Clint Eastwood’s direction is mostly solid and especially effective in the movie’s riveting last half-hour. As for J. Michael Straczynski’s screenplay, which is based on real events, it holds up nicely despite a couple of soft spots; for one thing, I thought Christine was vague – maybe even flippant – when she explained why her husband had left her and, for another, I would have liked to know what happened to the Rileys, two potential witnesses who were mentioned early on and then forgotten entirely.

At this point, you can guess where I’m going and I’ll make it even clearer: I have no choice but to recommend THE CHANGELING due to its incredible resilience. As if oblivious of its early failings, it simply chugs along until Christine Collins, real and imagined, takes over formidably and refuses to back off. In the end, Eastwood’s film dedicated to this remarkable woman will reward you with a potent and haunting climax that no one could dismiss. More importantly, it will remind you that abuse of power and human frailty are nothing new – particularly in Los Angeles – and that suspicion is more advisable than blind acceptance. Beware of illusions… such is the vital message behind THE CHANGELING. Incidentally and metaphorically speaking, the same could be said of those palm trees that speckle the LA skyline in the film’s outdoor shots. I have read somewhere – and I have not forgotten since – that these trees are not indigenous to Southern California. They were introduced there long ago and have thrived ever since… like a natural mirage for all of Tinseltown’s inhabitants. Christine Collins was also presented with a mirage. Beware, my friends, beware.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, August 2, 2010

Odd Couple (The)



Genre: comedy
With: Jack Lemmon, Walter Matthau, John Fiedler
Director: Gene Saks
Release: 1967
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Rating: G
MBiS score: 8.0/10


QuickView


Story-line: when marital problems leave Felix Ungar homeless, his good friend Oscar Madison invites him to stay at his place. But can Felix and Oscar be roomies as well as buddies?
Pluses: superb acting, Neil Simon’s fine screenplay, a typical mid-60s feel, Neal Hefti’s catchy musical theme.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: Lemmon and Matthau may have been cast as an odd couple in this funny movie but they were above all a formidable pair of thespians. Linguine aside, you will enjoy this pleasant, unassuming film!


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Man Who Wasn't There (The)



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Joel Coen
Release: 2001
Studio: Working Title Films, USA Films, Mike Zoss Productions – October Films, USA Films
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.1/10


For Once, It’s The Barber Who Gets The Itch


The time is 1949 and the place, Santa Rosa, California. Ed Crane (Billy Bob Thornton), a barber by trade and a taciturn by nature, lives quietly with his wife Doris (Frances McDormand), an accountant for Big Dave Brewster (James Gandolfini) at Nirdlinger’s department store. On the surface, you could argue that life is sweet for the Cranes but, true to the old saying about still waters running deep, Ed’s juices will begin stirring when businessman Creighton Tolliver (Jon Polito) comes to town. Tolliver is looking for a partner and Ed soon gets the urge to join him. Unfortunately, there’s a drawback in Tolliver’s proposal: to play the capitalism game with him, you gotta have capital. With Michael Badalucco (Frank Raffo), Tony Shalhoub (Freddie Riedenschneider), Katherine Borowitz (Ann Nirdlinger) and Scarlett Johansson (Rachel ‘Birdy’ Abundas). Screenplay by Ethan and Joel Coen.

As filmmakers go, the Coen brothers are neither revolutionaries nor iconoclasts but, in my mind, they are certainly off-kilter. Their films don’t quite fit into the industry mould and their original storytelling keeps you guessing from beginning to end. In the comedy genre, they have shown brilliance in RAISING ARIZONA and THE BIG LEBOWSKI, two favourites of mine. In a dramatic vein, they can also deliver startling films like NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. Here, heavy-duty irony is the brothers’ modus operandi and, though they have sprinkled Ed’s tortuous – and torturous – journey through life with touches of humour, THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE is a predominantly solemn film that feels oppressive, even claustrophobic.

To act out their dark screenplay, the Coens relied on a solid cast that delivers handsomely, with Billy Bob Thornton as the mainstay, I believe. The brothers have also chosen to use black and white film for the production, a process that enhances the noirish elements of Ed’s not so excellent adventure. The resulting movie feels lean, sober, unadorned, like those simple songs that have withstood the test of time and become our cherished classics.

For now, there is little else to say about THE MAN WHO WASN’T THERE except to recommend it without reservations. As Ed himself would put it, ‘Me, I don't talk much... I just cut the hair.’


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Saturday, July 17, 2010

American Graffiti



Genre: teen drama
With: Ron Howard, Richard Dreyfuss, Paul Le Mat
Director: George Lucas
Release: 1973
Studio: Lucasfilm, Ltd., Coppola Co., Universal Pictures – Universal Pictures
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.4/10


QuickView


Story-line: one late summer night in 1962, a group of young Californians try to ward off boredom and their fears about the future by cruising around town in search of action.
Pluses: a great screenplay, well-drawn and amiable characters, a solid cast, Suzanne Somers’ mysterious presence and a seminal soundtrack.
Minuses: none.
Comments: AMERICAN GRAFFITI, hailed as a triumph for George Lucas, remains one of the best teen movies ever made. Don’t miss this atmospheric and utterly enjoyable ode to youth, simpler times and rock’n’roll. Pure movie magic!


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Serpico



Genre: police drama
Director: Sidney Lumet
Release: 1974
Studio: Artists Entertainment Complex, De Laurentiis International Manufacturing Company SpA – Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.6/10


The Hand That Wouldn’t Wash The Other


When Frank ‘Paco’ Serpico (Al Pacino), one of New York City’s finest, is rushed to the hospital after a police raid that went amiss, the news travels fast and worries many. ‘Do you think he was shot by another cop?’, asks one officer at the precinct. ‘I know six who’d love to’, answers another. But how can one cop cause such resentment among his colleagues? To find out, see Sidney Lumet’s SERPICO. With John Randolph (Sidney Green), Jack Kehoe (Tom Keough), Biff McGuire (Captain McClain), Barbara Eda-Young (Laurie), Cornelia Sharpe (Leslie Land), Tony Roberts (Bob Blair), Allan Rich (D.A. Tauber), Norman Ornellas (Don Rubello), Ed Grover (Detective Lombardo), Gene Gross (Captain Tolkin), James Tolkin (Lieutenant Steiger), Lewis J. Stadlen (Jerry Berman), John Lehne (Gilbert) and M. Emmet Walsh (Gallagher). Screenplay by Waldo Salt and Norman Wexler.

When I chose to watch SERPICO, I expected it to be a bitter pill to swallow but, in its early stages, it uses drama and humour equally effectively to depict Frank’s rookie days at the NYPD and his life as a young adult settling down on his own, meeting people and kicking up his heels. At one point – when he is assigned to the Bureau of Criminal Identification – I even wondered how this sprightly young man would become the most hated cop in the force but, sure enough, his story will take a sharp turn after his promotion to detective work and, right then and there, SERPICO morphs into a nightmarish but wholly necessary movie experience. Though less exciting than THE FRENCH CONNECTION, another film on brutal law enforcement in the Big Apple, it is more harrowing and surely more important as a social statement about police work and systemic corruption.

Although it required a sizable and competent cast, SERPICO revolves around one character and one dominant actor. As Frank, Al Pacino makes you forget how small a man he really is by projecting a huge aura that overshadows everything and everybody else. He exhibits great range and natural talent as a funny and intelligent guy whose ideas will clash mightily with those of his more conservative colleagues and who will suffer greatly because of it. Tony Roberts also shines in a minor role but, again, it’s Pacino’s bravura performance that you’ll remember most of all.

The movie’s screenplay, based on real events and a book by Peter Maas, is both complex and varied, its dramatic flow interrupted by odd occurrences and colourful dialogues that leave no room for daintiness (‘You already have one foot in the shit. Put the other one in.’). Sidney Lumet’s tight direction keeps things moving along at a brisk pace while gritty cinematography by Arthur J. Ornitz and a solid musical score by Mikis Theodorakis capture the beauty and ugliness of life in Gotham. Try as I may, I can’t find any flaws in this production.

Still not convinced? Then allow me one final pitch… my three reasons to recommend SERPICO. (1) This film weaves a powerful tale about a police force turned upside down and the whistle-blower extraordinaire who tried to right it. (2) It remains an eloquent testament to the greatness of American cinema in the 70s. (3) It features Al Pacino in one of the hottest acting streaks you could ever imagine. Think about it: from 1972 to 1975, this superb thespian starred in THE GODFATHER, SCARECROW, SERPICO, THE GODFATHER II and DOG DAY AFTERNOON. A genuine tour de force, don’t you agree?


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, July 4, 2010

American Gigolo



Genre: psychological drama
With: Richard Gere, Lauren Hutton, Hector Elizondo
Director: Paul Schrader
Release: 1980
Studio: Pierre Associates, Paramount Pictures – Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.9/10


QuickView


Story-line: handsome Julian Kay, a fixture of L.A.’s elegant set, caters to mature women as a tourist guide and gigolo. For sure, his job comes with perks aplenty, but personal safety is not one of them.
Pluses: good acting, Paul Schrader’s screenplay and direction.
Minuses: none really.
Comments: don’t be misled by AMERICAN GIGOLO’s title: it’s neither filthy nor exploitative. In fact, it’s a serious and very watchable movie. One of many milestones in Richard Gere’s career.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Wrestler (The)



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Darren Aronofsky
Release: 2008
Studio: Protozoa Pictures, Saturn Films, Wild Bunch – Fox Searchlight Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Of Hammerlocks and Has-Beens


Randy ‘The Ram’ Robinson (Mickey Rourke) sure looks bushed sitting in the locker room, his muscular body bent over and aching like that of an old man. He gave it his all in the ring that night but the wrestling card was thinly attended and his pay will hardly be worth the effort. Such is the fate of a former great athlete but Randy doesn’t mind… he still loves the sport. Rock on, brother! With Marisa Tomei (Cassidy), Evan Rachel Wood (Stephanie), Judah Friedlander (Scott Brumberg), Ajay Naidu (the medic), Wass Stevens (Nick Volpe) and Todd Barry (Wayne).

When you think about it, wrestling is a very peculiar line of work. You train hard most days and work most nights, travel incessantly, cope with injuries, abuse and humiliation, deal with risks of all kinds and put up with aggressive fans who take the sport much too seriously for their own good. Though it grants you the rarest of fringe benefits – a chance to smack your co-workers day in, day out – it comes with a downside that gets steeper and steeper as age creeps up on you and younger athletes rise in the ranks. Not that glamorous a life, eh?

Such is Randy Robinson’s predicament at the beginning of THE WRESTLER. His mind is still on fighting, his body increasingly resists it but, altogether, he is not yet ready to retire. Thus he finds himself in limbo, a weekend warrior clinging to past glory and unprepared for the big changes just around the corner. The first half-hour of THE WRESTLER depicts this side of Randy, his professional side, and you may find it boring if you’re not particularly attracted to combat sports. To its credit, this segment offers candid insights into today’s wrestling world, its quirks, tricks and outrageous use of clichés, its twisted humour and the sincere camaraderie shared by its practitioners. Later on, the film addresses Randy’s personal life which is undoubtedly more interesting. You’ll get to know the man behind the mauler and, though Randy is certainly coarse, he’s also a nice enough guy who leads a grim existence. Other than meeting a club dancer he’s particularly fond of, he is saddled with serious financial and personal problems that I should leave unexplained for now.

All of this is developed with outright competence by Darren Aronofsky and crew. THE WRESTLER boasts a fine cast led by Oscar-nominated Mickey Rourke who appears both endearing and intimidating as Randy. In the ring, he looks like a juggernaut; outside, with his raspy voice, hearing aid and glasses, he could be your next-door neighbour. Marisa Tomei delivers a gutsy performance as Cassidy and Evan Rachel Wood is utterly convincing (yet again) as Stephanie. Kudos should go to Robert Siegel for his finely structured and logical screenplay. The film’s cinematography and production values are also quite satisfying.

What more can I say? That THE WRESTLER is a treasurable sports film because it chooses realism over pompousness and honesty over corniness. In a way, it manages to transcend its subject matter to reach all among us who are growing old and who feel that society is turning its back on them. Aging is such a sad reality that you can’t blame Randy for dodging it as long as he can. Will it be steroids or Geritol?


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Madame Bovary (1991)



Genre: psychological drama
With: Isabelle Huppert, Jean-François Balmer, Christophe Malavoy
Director: Claude Chabrol
Release: 1991
Studio: MK2 International, CED Productions, FR3 Films Productions – Samuel Goldwyn Company
Rating: PG-13
MBiS score: 8.0/10


QuickView


Story-line: Emma Rouault leaves her family’s farm to marry Doctor Charles Bovary but soon finds her new life too boring to endure.
Pluses: fine acting and dialogues, a strong drama, clean production values.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: a recent film adaptation of Gustave Flaubert’s classic novel of 1857. Emma and Charles... a true tragedy.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Roger Dodger



Genre: comedy drama
Director: Dylan Kidd
Release: 2002
Studio: Artisan Entertainment
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Unlocking the Secret Code of Love


Young Nick (Jesse Eisenberg) may be naive when it comes to matters of the heart but at least he knows where to find advice. Leaving his home in Ohio, he heads for the Big Apple to talk to his uncle Roger Swanson (Campbell Scott), a publicist and man about town who has a way with words and with women (or vice versa). Nick’s education in modern love can now begin in earnest. With Isabella Rossellini (Joyce Maynard, Roger’s boss), Jennifer Beals (Sophie) and Elizabeth Berkeley (Andrea).

I’ll be brief about this one. ROGER DODGER is a wily, spunky little film that should show you a good time if you pay attention and follow the rules. Really now, how can you go wrong with a teacher like Roger? He’s a persuasive chap, an experienced lover and a keen believer in hands-on training. Always remember the basics: ‘Sex is everywhere’. And if Roger’s not your idea of a nice guy, no problem… you’ll still love how Campbell Scott plays this Lothario to a T. Same goes for the cast around him, especially Jesse Eisenberg, Jennifer Beals and Elizabeth Berkeley, if you don’t mind me saying so.

The other big star of this sparkling little feature is Dylan Kidd, who penned its nifty screenplay and did wonders as a first-time helmer. ROGER DODGER was Kidd’s baby all the way and he can certainly be proud of it. I need not comment on the movie’s production values which are very adequate indeed.

Think you can handle it now? Then do your homework! Look up ROGER DODGER and watch it attentively. In doing so, you’ll realize that its lessons apply not only to young love but also to the movie industry itself. As I’ve written before, blockbusters and big names may attract all the hoopla but it’s often unheralded productions that are the most gratifying. Give this one a try for the sake of cinema.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Death in Venice



Genre: personal drama
With: Dirk Bogarde, Silvana Mangano, Bjorn Anderssen
Director: Luchino Visconti
Release: 1971
Studio: Alfa Cinematografica Productions et al. – Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution, Dear International
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.8/10


QuickView


Story-line: while in Venice, a composer suffering from depression is fascinated by a Polish lad on holiday with his family.
Pluses: gorgeous visuals, a strong emotional charge, fabulous music by Mahler, impeccable production values.
Minuses: because of its slow pace, some viewers may not appreciate this sad and splendid movie.
Comments: Visconti’s film remains a masterpiece of beauty. Few films have managed to translate emotions into moving pictures as well as DEATH IN VENICE.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Misérables (Les) (1998)



Genre: historical drama
Director: Bille August
Release: 1998
Studio: Mandalay Pictures – TriStar Pictures
Rating: PG-13
MBiS score: 8.0/10


How Imperfect Is The Law When Laid Down By Men


LES MISÉRABLES opens in the French town of Digne circa 1795. Jean Valjean (Liam Neeson), a bitter ex-con travelling to Dijon to meet his parole officer, accepts food and lodging from the local bishop (Peter Vaughan) but chooses to flee during the night with the cleric’s silverware. The very next day, Valjean is arrested and brought back to the bishop who, instead of pressing charges, offers him a set of valuable candlesticks. Valjean is taken aback by his good fortune but the bishop remains unshaken. 'You are no longer a man of the Devil, he says to Valjean. With this silver, I have redeemed your soul.' How right (or wrong) will the bishop be? We will know in the fullness of time. With Geoffrey Rush (Javert), Uma Thurman (Fantine), Mimi Newman (Cosette at age 8), Claire Danes (Cosette), Hans Matheson (Marius Pontmercy), Christopher Adamson (Bertin), Timothy Barlow (Lafitte), David Birkin (Courfeyrac), Patsy Byrne (Toussaint), Kathleen Byron (Mother Superior), Gillian Hanna (Madame Thénardier), Shane Hervey (Gavroche), Jon Kenny (Thénardier), Reine Brynolfsson (Beauvais), James Saxon (Chabouillet) and David McKay (the informer).

The French regard Victor Hugo's novel LES MISÉRABLES as an artistic triumph and, of course, they are right. In addition to a hit show on Broadway, this eternal literary work has spawned at least six movies, Bille August's being the most recent. Without revealing too much – in truth, there is enough content in this film that I'm in no real danger of blowing it – I should add that Valjean will build a new life for himself but, in so doing, will come under the scrutiny of Javert, a policeman who had briefly known him in prison. These two and several other characters in Hugo's work – Fantine, Cosette, Marius, Gavroche – are now legendary in France and elsewhere. It's easy to figure out why: they are universal in nature and their actions raise essential questions about life and love, crime, punishment and redemption.

LES MISÉRABLES is not a flawless movie. It lacks a certain French touch with its international cast using British accents but remains a valid and very entertaining feature. The acting here is top-notch, highlighted by strong turns from well-known names. Liam Neeson is praiseworthy as Valjean, a quiet and basically good man who, unlike SWEENEY TODD, will try to move on after an unfortunate start in life. As for Geoffrey Rush, you will love his performance but despise his Javert, that obsessive, overzealous snoop who sees Valjean's arrest as a career achievement. Uma Thurman delivers a fine Fantine, a character subjected to the same opprobrium that Valjean endured in his times of misery. Clare Danes and Hans Matheson also shine for the young generation.

Technically speaking, LES MISÉRABLES cannot be faulted. Cinematography, costumes, set design and period detail complement the narrative very efficiently and, while the film's pacing may feel a bit sluggish at first, it picks up considerably as the drama unfolds. Due credit must be given to Bille August for his sober direction and to Basil Poledouris for his competent musical score, especially his theme for oboe. What bothered me was a noticeable omission (or cut) in the script. While Valjean was never charged for the Digne incident, you will hear Javert claiming more than once that he is a convict and a wanted man. But how can that be? The movie doesn't explain. In fact, Javert's ranting became such an annoyance for me that I did some research after seeing the movie to find out if I had missed something. From what I gathered, Valjean did not change his ways immediately after his encounter with the bishop. While still in Digne, he stole a piece of silver from a little boy and then decided to give it back… but couldn't because the theft had already been reported. Thus he was considered in breach of his parole… and Javert's claim was legally well-founded. Keep this in mind when you watch the film and everything will fit a lot better… I want you to be clear-headed and on your toes when that dynamite ending comes along.

Frankly, this is all you need to know. As an entertainment vehicle, August's work reminded me of those great Saturday afternoons I used to spend at the Palace theatre when I was young… hmmm… younger. They used to show grand old swashbucklers and epic films that would take you on a roller coaster of emotions and keep you on the edge of your seat. This is what you'll get with LES MISÉRABLES, so sit tight and leave your problems behind for a couple of hours. Yes, this is what cinema is all about.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, June 7, 2010

Dolce Vita (La)



English title: The Sweet Life
Genre: slice-of-life drama
With: Marcello Mastroianni, Anouk Aimée, Yvonne Furneaux
Director: Federico Fellini
Release: 1960
Studio: Riama Film, Pathé Image, Gray Films – American International Pictures, Macmillan Audio Brandon
Rating: -
MBiS score: 9.2/10


QuickView


Story-line: LA DOLCE VITA recounts a few tumultuous days in the life of Marcello, an Italian gossip columnist who pays dearly for his every glimpse of glamour.
Pluses: superb acting and direction, magnificent symbolism, striking imagery and Anita Ekberg’s famous romp in a Roman fountain.
Minuses: if you expect high action and a continuous, all-embracing story, you won’t savour this ironic movie to the full. Fellini’s masterpiece is an episodic, meticulous and slightly dry watch.
Comments: LA DOLCE VITA is one of the biggies in the film universe – not only for its pioneering use of the term ‘paparazzi’ but also for its imagery – and all movie buffs should see it one day or another. A unique motion picture experience and a classic among classics.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street



Genre: musical drama
Director: Tim Burton
Release: 2007
Studio: DreamWorks, Warner Bros. Pictures, Neal Street Productions et al. – DreamWorks, Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Love That Bleeding In My Hand (sorry about that, Elton John!)


As their boat arrives in London one quiet night in 1802 (or is it 1840?), two men reflect on what the City means to them. The younger man, Anthony Hope (Jamie Campbell Bower), claims that London outshines all other splendours on Earth but his older mate, Sweeney Todd (Johnny Depp), compares it to a huge hole in which vermin scuttle about under the contemptuous gaze of a privileged class. Clearly, young Anthony sees life with the eyes of a romantic while Sweeney’s view is tainted by bitterness. But why such anger, may you ask? Because of a barber named Barker, fifteen years before. With Helena Bonham Carter (Mrs. Lovett), Sacha Baron Cohen (Signor Adolfo Pirelli), Alan Rickman (Turpin), Timothy Spall (Beadle Bamford), Jayne Wisener (Johanna), Laura Michelle Kelly (the Beggar Woman) and Ed Sanders (Tobias Ragg).

Tim Burton’s vivid imagination and seamless direction work wonders in this gothic and gory film based on Stephen Sondheim's Broadway hit. His gift for shadows, outrageous characters and cockroach jokes imbues every frame along with gorgeous, quasi-black and white cinematography and dazzling special effects. Burton’s vision is very dark, emulating Sweeney’s psychological bent, and the rivers of blood his barber-butcher draws from unsuspecting clients seem utterly psychedelic in dimmed lighting. This film is assuredly colourless but the action it depicts is colourful indeed, dramatic at times and a tad humourous also. Art design, makeup and far-out costumes heighten the tragic and comic aspects of the story. Visually and stylistically speaking, SWEENEY TODD is a magical, surreal and riveting experience about a man who has escaped a prison only to slip into another.

Your ears will also be contented with the atmospheric music and imaginative songs that carry Sweeney’s gruesome story. Some of these songs are sweet and funny, others are very sinister but all are well written and performed. The cast digs into them with abandon, exhibiting more than average talent; Johnny Depp sings with a threatening growl that befits his tortured character while Helena Bonham Carter tears through long stretches without catching her breath. It is on stuff like this that Broadway has built its lasting reputation. Throughout the movie, sound effects and soundscapes are thunderous.

SWEENEY TODD’s power is also evident in its acting. I can only admire Johnny Depp for his intensity and versatility; he cuts a fine and menacing figure with his arm thrust into the air, hand holding the blade of vengeance. Helena Bonham Carter is equally fabulous, and not only for her getups, thick makeup and crazy hairdo. Let’s face it, these two make a smashing couple from hell. Alan Rickman, always a delectable villain, manages to shine even though his character seems unidimensional; I would have liked to know what inner demon drove Turpin to unadulterated meanness. In a similar register, Sacha Baron Cohen’s clear knack for drama and accents caught me completely off guard. Is Sacha possessed by Peter Sellers’ ghost? Possibly, methinks. As for the other characters, they are mostly eclipsed by the abovementioned four and, though I have no intention of disparaging this or that one, I felt that Anthony and Johanna were a bit bland by comparison while Beadle Bamford is a caricature as the sidekick with a gimmick, a cane reminiscent of Al Pacino’s in SCENT OF A WOMAN.

If there is a weak link in this expertly rendered movie, I do believe it is the story-line itself – though the same could be said of many musicals on stage or on screen. Warning – spoilers ahead! Basically, SWEENEY TODD is a standard revenger story (think Monte Cristo) recounted in over-the-top operatic form. It relies on a few strong coincidences conveniently linking all characters and some of its narrative elements are not entirely valid. (1) In an important scene, the young and beautiful Johanna, Turpin’s captive and Anthony’s budding love interest, throws a key to our lad from her bedroom window while the jealous Turpin, watching her from a keyhole, chooses not to intervene. Logically, you’d expect a stiffer reaction from this ogre of a man if you consider how he repelled Anthony in an earlier encounter; in his place, at the very least, I would have barged into the room to scold Johanna and threaten Anthony from the window. While we’re at it, how did Johanna ever get her hands on a house key with a monster like Turpin hovering around her? (2) If you adhere to the story, Sweeney should be at least fourteen years older than Pirelli but, notwithstanding Sweeney’s lock of white hair, I never felt that the age difference was that wide on screen. (3) Tobias’ fond reminiscences about Pirelli seem exaggerated when you consider how the Italian barber mistreated him; similarly, the boy’s initial suspicions about Sweeney are not really explained. (4) I had difficulty believing that a vulnerable little boy like Tobias would commit the final act of violence in the story but, of course, it had to be committed by one of the characters and there weren’t many left at that point. I’ll admit that the youngster had stated earlier that he would do anything for Mrs. Lovett… but he had also suggested calling the police. Why, then, did he take matters into his own hands? For his sake, we’ll simply assume that he was driven by his will to survive… or poisoned by all those pies he ate. (5) Lastly, the movie is somewhat disingenuous about the message it wants to convey. By counterbalancing an ironic and morally acceptable conclusion with several detailed depictions of the same slaughterous act, it manages to trivialize (or even glorify) violence by hinting that slitting throats may be horrendous but is also very cool. Personally, I don’t consider myself an innocent and I don’t object to multiple deaths in a work of art but, if you compare this production with Franco Zeffirelli’s HAMLET for example, you’ll see how better things can be when less emphasis is put on bloodshed. For all these reasons, I cannot give SWEENEY TODD as high a mark as I would have liked but, in its present state, it does remain a solid film.

Enough said! I’m sure you get the picture… and you may readily see it. Just don’t take it too seriously. It’s not worth busting an artery the next time you see a razor.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Dangerous Liaisons



Genre: historical drama of manners
With: Glenn Close, John Malkovich, Michelle Pfeiffer
Director: Stephen Frears
Release: 1988
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures, Lorimar Film Entertainment, NFH Ltd. – Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.7/10


QuickView


Story-line: in old-time France, the aristocratic and redoubtable Madame de Merteuil plots revenge on a former lover.
Pluses: formidable acting, striking aesthetics, great direction, outstanding production values.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: like its rival VALMONT (another fine film on the same subject), this heavy-duty drama about love and cruelty among the rich and supposedly noble is based on a scandalous epistolary novel written in 1782 (!) by Choderlos de Laclos. This powerful film is proof positive that a great story never ages. A must for movie buffs.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Noces rouges (Les)



English titles: Blood Wedding, Red Wedding, Wedding in Blood
Genre: matrimonial drama
Director: Claude Chabrol
Release: 1970
Studio: Films la Boétie, Canaria Films – Films la Boétie, CIC Productions
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Let’s Play Adultery!


When political advisor Pierre Maury (Michel Piccoli) is hired by Paul Delamare (Claude Piéplu) to seal his bid for municipal office, he is quick to notice Lucienne Delamare (Stéphane Audran), Paul’s outgoing and sexy wife. For Pierre, who leads a joyless existence with Clothilde (Clothilde Joano), a depressed and sickly woman, Lucienne’s presence is both a blessing and a curse. What doth man do when the weight of duty and the rush of passion tear equally at his heart?

Claude Chabrol, an accomplished French director, makes fine dramas that unfold leisurely enough but never lack substance. LES NOCES ROUGES is a typically serious Chabrol but it also distinguishes itself from most films in this genre with its healthy dose of humour. In Pierre and Lucienne’s case, there is no guilt in hanky-panky… it’s all glee and boisterous fun. You’ll crack up, I’m sure, when you see the shenanigans these two perpetrate in the name of love. And when their affair leads to trouble, as often happens in these matters, Chabrol’s film is no less watchable for it.

Frankly, I couldn’t imagine better casting anywhere for a story such as this. Michel Piccoli, one of the wiliest thespians around, plays Pierre as an outwardly responsible man, all business and decorum, who turns into a lusting animal whenever Lucienne is close and willing. As for Stéphane Audran, she matches Piccoli’s performance with her own brand of spunk; there is one trick she does on him during an outdoor scene that sure looks like a practical joke and, if you catch it, you’ll notice Piccoli twitching with surprise. In a supporting role, Claude Piéplu doesn’t squander his chances either and his biting repartees are also worth a laugh or two. In other respects, LES NOCES ROUGES is a sober and solid production. The story-line, based on real-life events, deliberately leaves a couple of open questions but ends on a stunner, one last statement by Pierre that you will find both puzzling and disarmingly candid.

Let’s settle one more point. Should you see LES NOCES ROUGES, another in a long line of flicks showcasing the joys and perils of adultery? Yes, if you don’t mind me saying so. This excellent French film delivers enough drama, hijinks and mystery to please any movie buff.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Music of Chance (The)



Genre: drama and suspense
With: Mandy Patinkin, James Spader, M. Emmet Walsh
Director: Philip Haas
Release: 1993
Studio: By Chance Productions, American Playhouse, IRS Media – IRS Releasing
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.9/10


QuickView


Story-line: for Jim Nashe and Jack Pozzi, getting involved in a poker game seemed like a very good idea…
Pluses: fine acting (from the good guys and the bad guys), a devilish story-line, solid direction, great songs by Richard Strauss.
Minuses: don’t pick this one if you crave for a feel-good movie.
Comments: THE MUSIC OF CHANCE may be a modest production but its brutality will leave you dumbfounded. It’s like a living nightmare.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, May 10, 2010

Gone Baby Gone



Genre: crime drama
Director: Ben Affleck
Release: 2007
Studio: Touchstone Pictures, Miramax Films et al. – Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, Miramax Films
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.2/10


The More You See, The More It Hurts


Boston, Massachusetts. Patrick Kenzie (Casey Affleck) and his girlfriend Angie Gennaro (Michelle Monaghan), who are partners in a small detective agency, are approached by members of the McCready family to investigate the disappearance of little Amanda (Madeline O'Brien), a four-year-old girl. Although they are not ideally qualified for the job and Amanda’s case is already investigated by the police, Patrick and Angie accept to do their part for the McCreadys… not knowing what they’re getting into. With Amy Ryan (Helene McCready, Amanda’s mother), Titus Welliver (Lionel McCready), Amy Madigan (Bea McCready), Ed Harris (Remy Bressant), Morgan Freeman (Jack Doyle), John Ashton (Nick Poole), Mark Margolis (Leon Trett), Michael Kenneth Williams (Devin), Edi Gathegi (Cheese Jean-Baptiste) and Matthew Maher (Corwin Earle).

It’s quite easy to review a movie you have loved, especially when every critic out there agrees with you, but you can’t help second-guessing yourself when a film lauded by a large majority has left you with the blahs. Such is my frame of mind – a mixture of respect, disappointment and doubt – as I write about GONE BABY GONE, a drama that shows clear kinship with MYSTIC RIVER but cannot equal, at least in my book, Clint Eastwood’s superlative work. For better or for worse, here are my thoughts.

In Ben Affleck’s brave and competent oeuvre, there are things I admired and others that annoyed me. On the positive side, GONE BABY GONE carries a gritty, authentic feel steeped in working-class mores, dubious behaviour and deep mistrust for the police. As the eloquent and glamourless first scenes plainly show, people in Patrick Kenzie’s part of town can only survive if they acquire a steel-like toughness that locks in most human emotions; these are ordinary folk with little to hope for except arduous labour, fleeting love, habitual boredom and the temptations of crime, petty or otherwise. In such a milieu, investigating a kidnapping is no small task even for an insider: there will always be hidden facts to uncover, surprises to fathom, compromises to make. On this account, Affleck’s production clearly succeeds as a realistic representation of grim lives even if its effectiveness is marred by distant camera work early on in the narrative. Those few scenes filmed from afar don’t last long but they bothered me nevertheless.

GONE BABY GONE is well-stocked in acting talent but Casey Affleck stands out. He fully convinced me with his low-key portrayal of Patrick Kenzie, a man who has not turned his back on the past; there is something in this actor’s broken voice and soft delivery that reminds me of Alan Arkin’s supple playing. As for Michelle Monaghan, I have reservations not about her performance but about her inconsistent character; at times, Angie Gennaro dreads what lies ahead as would any tender-hearted woman but, in others, she acts with inexplicable calmness in the face of imminent danger or even demonstrates patent ruthlessness. In supporting roles, Amy Ryan offered a fine interpretation, Edi Gathegi also; Ed Harris and Morgan Freeman in no way tarnished their sterling reputations.

As for the movie’s story-line, it is irreproachable – up to a point. The action develops slowly but gathers noticeable momentum as the investigation moves along. There are turns and complications, violent emotional setbacks (as in BLACK RAIN, I thought), genuine mystery and suspense. Truly, the screenplay goes to great lengths to offer something different and, while things looked quite murky midway, I never doubted that an answer would emerge. When it did, however, I was simply unable to accept it. Here’s why. Warning – spoilers ahead! (1) When you think about it, the motive for the kidnapping was not very sound. Consider the people who stood to benefit from the crime: a former police officer (of all people!) and his faithful wife, senior citizens to boot. They will be in their eighties by the time Amanda comes out of adolescence! As justification, it is stated that the couple had lost a little girl many years ago… but why have they waited this long before filling the void in their lives? With so many orphans stranded in our world, wouldn’t legal adoption make more sense than stealing a child, especially for a retired policeman? Was it all worth the risks involved? Could this twisted man turn into a ‘serial adopter’ if left unaccountable? And since when has the police substituted itself for social services in order to remove a child from her mother’s care? (2) On another level, the targeting of Amanda resulted from actions and decisions that were not entirely plausible. Why was she picked, especially when the kidnappers knew about her mother’s erratic lifestyle, drug connections and shady relations? Wouldn’t a policeman be attracted to a child with a healthier background? This sort of kidnapping, I guess, would seem more believable in a small town – where some people are well-connected and freely put their fingers where they shouldn’t – but to see it happen in a major city may be a stretch. And how do you figure out Amanda’s new life? Has she been brainwashed into accepting her forced adoption? How was it explained to her? Doesn’t she still remember Mommy? (3) Seen as a whole, the machinations required to cover up the kidnapping go beyond the mandatory ‘suspension of disbelief’. You have lies, intimidation, the police incidentally suspecting known child molesters for the kidnapping, an elaborate exchange taking place in a remote area, drug traffickers being murdered, a botched raid and a police detective disguised as a robber who barges into a watering hole to threaten his contact in front of the bartender and several witnesses… in other words, a smorgasbord for conspiracy fans. Would you go this far for a little girl? I sure wouldn’t… and I can only surmise that the story was conceived in such a way that Amanda would be spared. Because of this emphasis on suspense over logic, the story-line thus failed entirely for me despite its other qualities and treasurable little denouement. Accordingly, I don’t see how I can award this film (without regard to Dennis Lehane’s book on the subject) anything more than a very low passing grade.

In conclusion, is GONE BABY GONE worth your precious time? Certainly if you’re in the mood for a robust and gruelling film that is all guts and messy situations and if you’re ready to overlook the snags in its story-line. As for me, you know where I stand. To quote Brando’s famous line in ON THE WATERFRONT, this film ‘could have been a contender’ but its punch was deadened by one twist too many. Nevertheless, it goes the distance like a granite-jawed brawler bent on punishing everyone - its characters, viewers and even this would-be reviewer - in the process. I hope you’ll understand.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Discrète (La)



Genre: romantic drama
With: Fabrice Luchini, Judith Henry, Maurice Garrel
Director: Christian Vincent
Release: 1990
Studio: Productions Lazennec, Sara Films et al. – MK2 International
Rating: -
MBiS score: 8.1/10


QuickView


Story-line: after being dumped by Solange, Antoine, a disenchanted writer and civil servant, accepts his editor’s proposal to seduce another girl strictly out of revenge.
Pluses: exemplary acting and direction, Fabrice Luchini at his sarcastic best, clean production values, great music by Schubert.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: schemes about love have often been depicted in the movies, with mixed results overall. Nevertheless, when treated with good taste, this premise has produced some marvellous works like LA DISCRÈTE and René Clair’s LES GRANDES MANOEUVRES. In its own way, Christian Vincent’s film is a treacherous watch because you mustn't let Antoine’s meanness put you off. Life, as always, is full of surprises.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monster's Ball



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Marc Forster
Release: 2001
Studio: Lee Daniels Entertainment, Lionsgate – Lionsgate
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.2/10


The Widow and the Widow-maker


While Lawrence Musgrove (Sean Combs) spends his last days on death row at Jackson Penitentiary, his wife Leticia (Halle Berry) and their son Tyrell (Coronji Calhoun) are understandably devastated and uncertain about the future. In an unusual way, Lawrence’s fate will also change the lives of Hank (Billy Bob Thornton) and Sonny (Heath Ledger) Grotowski, a father and son team of prison guards assigned to escort him to his execution. With Peter Boyle (Buck Grotowski, Hank’s father, himself a former prison guard).

Although Albert Camus once wrote ‘It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners’, MONSTER’S BALL focuses as much on enforcers of the death penalty as on a woman and a son indirectly subjected to it. In this sense, Marc Forster’s work speaks of issues not covered by DEAD MAN WALKING and other prison films but, like them, it is patently grim, achingly raw and psychologically demanding, especially at first. Eventually, it gains in humanity in the aftermath of Lawrence’s execution as it allows its characters to experience disillusion and want, reflect on the tribulations of life and move a step or two forward on the road to rebirth. Judging from reviews I had read beforehand, I had a distinct feeling that this movie would be heavy-handed and implausible but, thanks to a masterful screenplay by Milo Addica and Will Rokos, it unfolds in a logical and considered way. As you will discover, MONSTER’S BALL tackles violence, capital punishment and ingrained racism head-on and succeeds unequivocally because of its complete candidness.

Of course, a feature such as this would not have carried without a strong cast and superior acting. Halle Berry earned her Oscar nod as a woman faced with a brutal future and Billy Bob Thornton provided her with solid support; one special scene between them will take your breath away (you’ll know which one). Production values are irreproachable. The story here was paramount and nothing was done to compromise it.

Honestly, I have little else to add about MONSTER’S BALL, a film that deserves recognition for its seriousness and fine craftsmanship. As it demonstrates with gut-wrenching eloquence, there are neither easy answers nor pat solutions in life but there is hope, even if it seems scant or fragile.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved