Search This Blog

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Raise the Red Lantern



Also known as: Da hong deng long gao gao gua
Genre: psychological drama
With: Gong Li, He Caifei, Cao Cuifeng
Director: Zhang Yimou
Release: 1991
Studio: Era International, Salon Productions, China Film Co-production Corporation – Orion Classics
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.5/10


QuickView


Story-line: after accepting to marry a rich Chinese master, nineteen-year-old Songlian moves to his mansion… to live with his three other wives.
Pluses: beautiful visuals and costumes, impeccable acting, remarkable direction and a strong story about household politics.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: this brutal Chinese film set in the 20s showcases Zhang Yimou’s world-class talent as a director and Gong Li’s fearsome acting chops. No doubt about it, this picture is a biggie.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Genou de Claire (Le)



English title: Claire’s Knee
Genre: psychological comedy
Director: Éric Rohmer
Release: 1970
Studio: Les Films du Losange
Background material on Éric Rohmer: bloomberg.net
Rating: –
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Dietrich Was Right… You Can Be Both An Intellectual And A Pervert


In the late 70s and early 80s, one of the best comedies on TV was BARNEY MILLER, which featured a squad of NYPD detectives and the cases they were assigned to solve. Though its stories almost exclusively took place in one cramped and dingy precinct office and were based on personal interaction between its regular characters, I never found it boring. Among the cops, my favourite was Arthur Dietrich, the conspicuously clever one who often got on his colleagues’ nerves. The title of this review refers to one episode in which a woman had laid indecency charges against a college professor and the prof had protested to Dietrich that he was a ‘scholar’. Dietrich’s retort, as hinted above, was less than supportive for the alleged offender.

LE GENOU DE CLAIRE is our first foray into the late Éric Rohmer’s film universe and, if you’ve heard about him, you’ll understand my reference to BARNEY MILLER. In a typical Rohmer, sets are of little importance, dialogues drive the plot much more than concrete action and story-lines feed on character psychology and personal interaction. Overall, this director kept his dramas light and his comedies refined, thus authoring films that some people will find tediously genteel but others quite wise and rewarding. Among the handful I have seen, my top choice remains MA NUIT CHEZ MAUD but the perverse LE GENOU DE CLAIRE is a fine introduction to Rohmer’s original style of moviemaking.

Generally speaking, LE GENOU DE CLAIRE goes like this. Jérôme (Jean-Claude Brialy), a French diplomat posted in Sweden, returns to his homeland to settle personal matters. In the process, he hitches up with Aurora (Aurora Cornu), a novelist and dear friend, who introduces him to Mrs. Walter (Michèle Montel) and her family. Feelings of love will soon be revealed… in addition to an ardent, unsettling attraction that should be left unexplained for now.

In this dryly funny picture, what stands out is the rapport between Aurora and Jérôme who discuss and analyze his obsession (?) as if they were psychiatrist and patient. To some, their tête-à-têtes will probably seem static and stilted but, to art film fans and francophiles in particular, they serve as a dandy illustration of that legendary Gallic sense for argumentation… and a mighty peculiar way to tickle the viewer. While you sit there, privy to all of that pensiveness, poetry and plotting, you really wonder where it will all lead you. Better yet, you’ll find yourself entangled in one of those small-scale mysteries that Rohmer relished so much and recounted on screen with intriguing and even mesmerizing results.

If you like your acting flamboyant and noisy, you will be disappointed with LE GENOU DE CLAIRE. Such a quiet film required restraint from its cast, which is exactly what it got from the trio above and also from Béatrice Romand, Gérard Falconetti, Laurence de Monaghan and Fabrice Luchini; however, since the story revolves around Jérôme, expect to see a lot of Jean-Claude Brialy who is brilliant as an earnest-looking but shifty fellow. Production values are satisfying and sober. As for Rohmer’s direction and writing, I see no reason to complain; when I think of many recent movies that have been hyped as great works but are really defective or worthless, I can only admire a creator capable of turning trivial-seeming events into appealing little stories so attuned to our human condition. Such is the miracle of cinema and I can testify to its power.

Has my review been fair enough? I do hope so and, since we’re friends, I won’t hold it against you if you choose not to see this film. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly recommend LE GENOU DE CLAIRE to anyone who loves logical comedies and polished entertainment. I’ll admit that Rohmer’s brand of filmmaking is an acquired taste but it’s a taste no one can acquire without starting somewhere. Here’s to Jean-Marie Maurice Schérer (1920-2010), a pioneer of the French ‘new wave’ and a director François Truffaut respectfully called ‘our master’.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Do the Right Thing



Genre: social drama
With: Spike Lee, Danny Aiello, Ossie Davis
Director: Spike Lee
Release: 1989
Studio: Sound One, Deluxe Digital Media, 40 Acres & A Mule Filmworks, Da Moulan Van Movie Company
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.2/10


QuickView


Story-line: one hot day in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of New York City, Sal’s Famous Pizzeria becomes the focal point of neighbourhood tensions.
Pluses: strong acting, excellent character development, a foreboding mood and a realistic story.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: a mature and excellent work about race relations and a great effort by writer-director-actor Spike Lee. DO THE RIGHT THING can truly be called a ‘slice-of-life’ film.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Clockwork Orange (A)



Genre: psychological drama
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Release: 1971
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures, Kinney Company, Polaris Productions, Hawks Films Limited – Warner Bros. Pictures International
Song lyrics: Mick Jagger and Keith Richards (1968)
Rating: R
MBiS score: 9.1/10


Sympathy For The Devil


Those young men sipping drinks at the Korova Milkbar are no ordinary patrons. They call themselves the Droogs – a raucous gang of hooligans led by one Alex DeLarge (Malcolm McDowell) – and they don’t intend to loaf about all evening. When good and ready, they’ll surely prowl the city’s dark corners looking for kicks and, by Jove, there will be kicks to be had! With Warren Clarke (Dim the Droog), James Marcus (Georgie the Droog), Michael Tarn (Pete the Droog), Patrick Magee (Mr. Alexander), Michael Bates (Barnes), John Clive (Stage Actor), Adrienne Corri (Mrs. Alexander), Carl Duering (Brodsky), Paul Farrell (Tramp) and Clive Francis (Joe). Production team: Bill Butler (editor), Russell Hagg and Peter Sheilds (art directors), John Barry (production designer), Ron Beck (wardrobe supervisor), Milena Canonero (costume designer) and Walter (Wendy) Carlos (music, interpreting compositions by Beethoven, Rossini, Elgar and others).

When the Beatles and the Rolling Stones reached superstardom in the mid-60s, a few years before A CLOCKWORK ORANGE was released, their songs and musical directions divided young fans and adults alike. If you loved pop rock transcendence and beautiful harmonies, the Beatles were your band and your folks didn’t complain much. If raw blues rock, sexual suggestiveness and a whiff of danger were your bag, you idolized the Stones but mom and pop cringed. One could argue that the same dichotomy holds true for movie masterpieces. Most are rooted in noble symbolism or portray man’s primary struggles on Earth but Stanley Kubrick’s classic about Alex and his ruffians stands out like a black sheep among the flock, a deleterious work conceived by rough-and-tumble souls. In spirit, it owes little to the Beatles but shares plenty with SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL, the Stones’ scary hit from 1968.

Please allow me to introduce myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste


Early on, the level of violence in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE may shock you as the Droogs, who give little credence to social conventions, let their boots, fists and knives do the talking for them. If you consider these scenes repulsive or sadistic – as they obviously are – keep in mind that the mayhem lasts only fifteen minutes or so and is tempered with a peculiar brand of sick and witty humour. Hang on to your bowlers, mates!

But what's puzzling you
Is the nature of my game


Once this intemperate introduction has passed, Kubrick’s film slows down to focus on Alex, his private life and delinquency problems. In this context, our devilish dandy appears less like a monster and more like a prototypical anti-hero. The lad shows intellectual curiosity, a love for classical music and mammoth mojo (!).

Killed the Czar and his ministers
Anastasia screamed in vain


After another flurry of gratuitous violence, the movie changes gears with Alex becoming the hero – quite literally – of a contemporary fable alternately hilarious and creepy. From there, the film’s story-line mixes nightmarish terror, devastating humour, a hard satirical bent on politics and society (a recurrent theme in Kubrick’s oeuvre) and joyful irreverence towards religion and authority. Deep down, its Orwellian message about crime and punishment, political expediency, science and ethical issues will appear bracingly serious and its verdict, surprisingly moral. That’s as far as I’ll go for now but, if you’re anything like me, you will come to accept young Alex… and even root for the roguish bugger!

Just call me Lucifer
'Cause I'm in need of some restraint


A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is certainly not Satan’s handiwork but it remains diabolically clever – pun intended, of course. Taking their cue from an Anthony Burgess novel, Kubrick and his magnificent team fashioned not just a dirty allegory but a blowout for the senses. Jazzed-up dialogues (the Droogs speak their own crazy lingo), bizarre costumes, mind-blowing sets leaning on the ultra-modern and decked out in psychedelic colours (fuchsia and lime green!) and a souped-up musical score fusing synthesizers and old-world compositions collectively establish a surreal mood that prefigures some of EYES WIDE SHUT’s stranger moments. Between you and me, I have long thought that Stanley Kubrick was an Englishman and this film reinforces the illusion. Moreover, his in-your-face demonstrations of erotica and sexual mischief are remarkably adroit – most other filmmakers would look juvenile if they tried this kind of stuff but he manages to pull it off with unrepentant glee. Scenes that would be innocuous or drab in other movies look funny and even grotesque in Kubrick's offbeat vision of the world.

So if you meet me
Have some courtesy
Have some sympathy, have some taste


Acting-wise, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is mainly Malcolm McDowell’s show and he delivers a masterful performance in an unglamorous role. His mellifluous voice and very British accent are immediately captivating while his playing runs the gamut of emotions, from evil playfulness to unforced civility. A competent cast affords him noteworthy support in a variety of roles, some good, some nasty indeed.

Use all your well-learned politesse
Or I'll lay your soul to waste, mmm yeah


I’ll sum up with an easy riddle – and feel free to interrupt me if you know the answer (!). What do you get when you mix Kubrick and Burgess, genius and madness, an electrifying story and a form of intellectual perversion rarely seen in modern culture? A very subversive movie and, better yet, an outrageous piece of cinema that shames many of today’s so-called ‘masterpieces’. Speak of the devil!


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Best Intentions (The)



Genre: relationship drama
With: Pernilla August, Samuel Fröler, Max von Sydow
Director: Bille August
Release: 1992
Studio: STV1 Drama, ZDF, Channel 4, RAIDUE, La Sept, DR, YLE 2, NRK, RUV
Rating: -
MBiS score: 8.4/10


QuickView


Story-line: when Henryk Bergman, a stern young Swede studying to become a pastor, visits his friend Ernst Akerblom and meets Ernst’s sister Anna, you can feel that love is in the air… but a love that will be faced with tremendous obstacles.
Pluses: a serious and moving story, striking characters, seamless direction and impressive acting.
Minuses: the film’s length (3 hours) may scare off some but, really, do try to see this splendid, thoughtful feature.
Comments: this movie about Ingmar Bergman’s star-crossed parents is a true representation of life’s plain and sombre struggles. Pure cinema in its most useful, artful form.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Lost In Translation



Genre: comedy drama
Director: Sofia Coppola
Release: 2003
Studio: American Zoetrope, Elemental Films, Focus Features
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.3/10


A Kiss is Just a Kiss (thank you, Louis Armstrong)


Bob Harris (Bill Murray), a washed up American actor who appears in TV ads to fend off irrelevance, finds himself in Tokyo one day to shoot a commercial for Suntory whisky. Jet-lagged, distracted and groggy, he is visibly bored despite the attention he receives as a celebrity guest. Things will change, however, when he unexpectedly meets Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson), a young compatriot with problems of her own. With Giovanni Ribisi (John), Anna Faris (Kelly) and Catherine Lambert (the jazz singer).

Some movies are more difficult to fathom than others and LOST IN TRANSLATION is one such film. Neither loud nor busy, it deals in emotions and lets them evolve at a natural pace, truly reflecting life as you and I live it. For this reason, don’t expect big laughs or gut-wrenching action from this film but subtle comedy, light drama and a pleasantly disorienting mood. In her screenplay, Sofia Coppola chose to practise empathy and I don’t see how else she could have depicted her two travellers stranded in a foreign land, struggling to understand their surroundings and what is happening to them. When you go abroad, especially in a country with a culture vastly different from yours, the need to confide in someone you trust is a strong and natural reaction that both Bob and Charlotte will act upon with complete candour.

Technically speaking, LOST IN TRANSLATION remains true to its purpose. It genuinely cares for its characters and shows them for what they are, without fanfare nor pretense. Bill Murray was given a role perfectly suited to him and Scarlett Johansson played hers with justifiable restraint as a young woman searching for the key to her future. The age difference between Bob and Charlotte may – or may not – matter in the story. By comparison, other characters are relegated to bit parts while the real support comes from Japan’s capital, fabulous and iridescent, awesome but never hostile, a city brimming with movement and friendly people; the camera clearly adores Tokyo’s vistas and captures them with elegance. As for Ms. Coppola’s direction, it carries the narrative smoothly and competently.

However, all this beauty and sympathy comes at a cost and LOST IN TRANSLATION suffers from a lack of content that may leave you unfulfilled. I cannot help comparing it with BROKEN FLOWERS, another vehicle for Bill Murray’s deadpan best, which wasn’t a powerhouse either but managed to get the viewer a little more involved than this one. As sensitive a movie as Ms. Coppola’s can be, it remains slight and feels at times like a travelogue. The film’s denouement, also, can hardly be called a climax.

I know that many in moviedom have expressed admiration for LOST IN TRANSLATION but, in life as in matters of motion picture entertainment, it never hurts to be choosy. You may watch this film if you want to – it’s agreeable all right – but I wouldn’t call it essential viewing. As George Borrow once said, ‘Translation is at best an echo.’ Sorry.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved