Search This Blog

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Madame Bovary (1991)



Genre: psychological drama
With: Isabelle Huppert, Jean-François Balmer, Christophe Malavoy
Director: Claude Chabrol
Release: 1991
Studio: MK2 International, CED Productions, FR3 Films Productions – Samuel Goldwyn Company
Rating: PG-13
MBiS score: 8.0/10


QuickView


Story-line: Emma Rouault leaves her family’s farm to marry Doctor Charles Bovary but soon finds her new life too boring to endure.
Pluses: fine acting and dialogues, a strong drama, clean production values.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: a recent film adaptation of Gustave Flaubert’s classic novel of 1857. Emma and Charles... a true tragedy.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Roger Dodger



Genre: comedy drama
Director: Dylan Kidd
Release: 2002
Studio: Artisan Entertainment
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Unlocking the Secret Code of Love


Young Nick (Jesse Eisenberg) may be naive when it comes to matters of the heart but at least he knows where to find advice. Leaving his home in Ohio, he heads for the Big Apple to talk to his uncle Roger Swanson (Campbell Scott), a publicist and man about town who has a way with words and with women (or vice versa). Nick’s education in modern love can now begin in earnest. With Isabella Rossellini (Joyce Maynard, Roger’s boss), Jennifer Beals (Sophie) and Elizabeth Berkeley (Andrea).

I’ll be brief about this one. ROGER DODGER is a wily, spunky little film that should show you a good time if you pay attention and follow the rules. Really now, how can you go wrong with a teacher like Roger? He’s a persuasive chap, an experienced lover and a keen believer in hands-on training. Always remember the basics: ‘Sex is everywhere’. And if Roger’s not your idea of a nice guy, no problem… you’ll still love how Campbell Scott plays this Lothario to a T. Same goes for the cast around him, especially Jesse Eisenberg, Jennifer Beals and Elizabeth Berkeley, if you don’t mind me saying so.

The other big star of this sparkling little feature is Dylan Kidd, who penned its nifty screenplay and did wonders as a first-time helmer. ROGER DODGER was Kidd’s baby all the way and he can certainly be proud of it. I need not comment on the movie’s production values which are very adequate indeed.

Think you can handle it now? Then do your homework! Look up ROGER DODGER and watch it attentively. In doing so, you’ll realize that its lessons apply not only to young love but also to the movie industry itself. As I’ve written before, blockbusters and big names may attract all the hoopla but it’s often unheralded productions that are the most gratifying. Give this one a try for the sake of cinema.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Death in Venice



Genre: personal drama
With: Dirk Bogarde, Silvana Mangano, Bjorn Anderssen
Director: Luchino Visconti
Release: 1971
Studio: Alfa Cinematografica Productions et al. – Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution, Dear International
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.8/10


QuickView


Story-line: while in Venice, a composer suffering from depression is fascinated by a Polish lad on holiday with his family.
Pluses: gorgeous visuals, a strong emotional charge, fabulous music by Mahler, impeccable production values.
Minuses: because of its slow pace, some viewers may not appreciate this sad and splendid movie.
Comments: Visconti’s film remains a masterpiece of beauty. Few films have managed to translate emotions into moving pictures as well as DEATH IN VENICE.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Misérables (Les) (1998)



Genre: historical drama
Director: Bille August
Release: 1998
Studio: Mandalay Pictures – TriStar Pictures
Rating: PG-13
MBiS score: 8.0/10


How Imperfect Is The Law When Laid Down By Men


LES MISÉRABLES opens in the French town of Digne circa 1795. Jean Valjean (Liam Neeson), a bitter ex-con travelling to Dijon to meet his parole officer, accepts food and lodging from the local bishop (Peter Vaughan) but chooses to flee during the night with the cleric’s silverware. The very next day, Valjean is arrested and brought back to the bishop who, instead of pressing charges, offers him a set of valuable candlesticks. Valjean is taken aback by his good fortune but the bishop remains unshaken. 'You are no longer a man of the Devil, he says to Valjean. With this silver, I have redeemed your soul.' How right (or wrong) will the bishop be? We will know in the fullness of time. With Geoffrey Rush (Javert), Uma Thurman (Fantine), Mimi Newman (Cosette at age 8), Claire Danes (Cosette), Hans Matheson (Marius Pontmercy), Christopher Adamson (Bertin), Timothy Barlow (Lafitte), David Birkin (Courfeyrac), Patsy Byrne (Toussaint), Kathleen Byron (Mother Superior), Gillian Hanna (Madame Thénardier), Shane Hervey (Gavroche), Jon Kenny (Thénardier), Reine Brynolfsson (Beauvais), James Saxon (Chabouillet) and David McKay (the informer).

The French regard Victor Hugo's novel LES MISÉRABLES as an artistic triumph and, of course, they are right. In addition to a hit show on Broadway, this eternal literary work has spawned at least six movies, Bille August's being the most recent. Without revealing too much – in truth, there is enough content in this film that I'm in no real danger of blowing it – I should add that Valjean will build a new life for himself but, in so doing, will come under the scrutiny of Javert, a policeman who had briefly known him in prison. These two and several other characters in Hugo's work – Fantine, Cosette, Marius, Gavroche – are now legendary in France and elsewhere. It's easy to figure out why: they are universal in nature and their actions raise essential questions about life and love, crime, punishment and redemption.

LES MISÉRABLES is not a flawless movie. It lacks a certain French touch with its international cast using British accents but remains a valid and very entertaining feature. The acting here is top-notch, highlighted by strong turns from well-known names. Liam Neeson is praiseworthy as Valjean, a quiet and basically good man who, unlike SWEENEY TODD, will try to move on after an unfortunate start in life. As for Geoffrey Rush, you will love his performance but despise his Javert, that obsessive, overzealous snoop who sees Valjean's arrest as a career achievement. Uma Thurman delivers a fine Fantine, a character subjected to the same opprobrium that Valjean endured in his times of misery. Clare Danes and Hans Matheson also shine for the young generation.

Technically speaking, LES MISÉRABLES cannot be faulted. Cinematography, costumes, set design and period detail complement the narrative very efficiently and, while the film's pacing may feel a bit sluggish at first, it picks up considerably as the drama unfolds. Due credit must be given to Bille August for his sober direction and to Basil Poledouris for his competent musical score, especially his theme for oboe. What bothered me was a noticeable omission (or cut) in the script. While Valjean was never charged for the Digne incident, you will hear Javert claiming more than once that he is a convict and a wanted man. But how can that be? The movie doesn't explain. In fact, Javert's ranting became such an annoyance for me that I did some research after seeing the movie to find out if I had missed something. From what I gathered, Valjean did not change his ways immediately after his encounter with the bishop. While still in Digne, he stole a piece of silver from a little boy and then decided to give it back… but couldn't because the theft had already been reported. Thus he was considered in breach of his parole… and Javert's claim was legally well-founded. Keep this in mind when you watch the film and everything will fit a lot better… I want you to be clear-headed and on your toes when that dynamite ending comes along.

Frankly, this is all you need to know. As an entertainment vehicle, August's work reminded me of those great Saturday afternoons I used to spend at the Palace theatre when I was young… hmmm… younger. They used to show grand old swashbucklers and epic films that would take you on a roller coaster of emotions and keep you on the edge of your seat. This is what you'll get with LES MISÉRABLES, so sit tight and leave your problems behind for a couple of hours. Yes, this is what cinema is all about.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, June 7, 2010

Dolce Vita (La)



English title: The Sweet Life
Genre: slice-of-life drama
With: Marcello Mastroianni, Anouk Aimée, Yvonne Furneaux
Director: Federico Fellini
Release: 1960
Studio: Riama Film, Pathé Image, Gray Films – American International Pictures, Macmillan Audio Brandon
Rating: -
MBiS score: 9.2/10


QuickView


Story-line: LA DOLCE VITA recounts a few tumultuous days in the life of Marcello, an Italian gossip columnist who pays dearly for his every glimpse of glamour.
Pluses: superb acting and direction, magnificent symbolism, striking imagery and Anita Ekberg’s famous romp in a Roman fountain.
Minuses: if you expect high action and a continuous, all-embracing story, you won’t savour this ironic movie to the full. Fellini’s masterpiece is an episodic, meticulous and slightly dry watch.
Comments: LA DOLCE VITA is one of the biggies in the film universe – not only for its pioneering use of the term ‘paparazzi’ but also for its imagery – and all movie buffs should see it one day or another. A unique motion picture experience and a classic among classics.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street



Genre: musical drama
Director: Tim Burton
Release: 2007
Studio: DreamWorks, Warner Bros. Pictures, Neal Street Productions et al. – DreamWorks, Paramount Pictures
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Love That Bleeding In My Hand (sorry about that, Elton John!)


As their boat arrives in London one quiet night in 1802 (or is it 1840?), two men reflect on what the City means to them. The younger man, Anthony Hope (Jamie Campbell Bower), claims that London outshines all other splendours on Earth but his older mate, Sweeney Todd (Johnny Depp), compares it to a huge hole in which vermin scuttle about under the contemptuous gaze of a privileged class. Clearly, young Anthony sees life with the eyes of a romantic while Sweeney’s view is tainted by bitterness. But why such anger, may you ask? Because of a barber named Barker, fifteen years before. With Helena Bonham Carter (Mrs. Lovett), Sacha Baron Cohen (Signor Adolfo Pirelli), Alan Rickman (Turpin), Timothy Spall (Beadle Bamford), Jayne Wisener (Johanna), Laura Michelle Kelly (the Beggar Woman) and Ed Sanders (Tobias Ragg).

Tim Burton’s vivid imagination and seamless direction work wonders in this gothic and gory film based on Stephen Sondheim's Broadway hit. His gift for shadows, outrageous characters and cockroach jokes imbues every frame along with gorgeous, quasi-black and white cinematography and dazzling special effects. Burton’s vision is very dark, emulating Sweeney’s psychological bent, and the rivers of blood his barber-butcher draws from unsuspecting clients seem utterly psychedelic in dimmed lighting. This film is assuredly colourless but the action it depicts is colourful indeed, dramatic at times and a tad humourous also. Art design, makeup and far-out costumes heighten the tragic and comic aspects of the story. Visually and stylistically speaking, SWEENEY TODD is a magical, surreal and riveting experience about a man who has escaped a prison only to slip into another.

Your ears will also be contented with the atmospheric music and imaginative songs that carry Sweeney’s gruesome story. Some of these songs are sweet and funny, others are very sinister but all are well written and performed. The cast digs into them with abandon, exhibiting more than average talent; Johnny Depp sings with a threatening growl that befits his tortured character while Helena Bonham Carter tears through long stretches without catching her breath. It is on stuff like this that Broadway has built its lasting reputation. Throughout the movie, sound effects and soundscapes are thunderous.

SWEENEY TODD’s power is also evident in its acting. I can only admire Johnny Depp for his intensity and versatility; he cuts a fine and menacing figure with his arm thrust into the air, hand holding the blade of vengeance. Helena Bonham Carter is equally fabulous, and not only for her getups, thick makeup and crazy hairdo. Let’s face it, these two make a smashing couple from hell. Alan Rickman, always a delectable villain, manages to shine even though his character seems unidimensional; I would have liked to know what inner demon drove Turpin to unadulterated meanness. In a similar register, Sacha Baron Cohen’s clear knack for drama and accents caught me completely off guard. Is Sacha possessed by Peter Sellers’ ghost? Possibly, methinks. As for the other characters, they are mostly eclipsed by the abovementioned four and, though I have no intention of disparaging this or that one, I felt that Anthony and Johanna were a bit bland by comparison while Beadle Bamford is a caricature as the sidekick with a gimmick, a cane reminiscent of Al Pacino’s in SCENT OF A WOMAN.

If there is a weak link in this expertly rendered movie, I do believe it is the story-line itself – though the same could be said of many musicals on stage or on screen. Warning – spoilers ahead! Basically, SWEENEY TODD is a standard revenger story (think Monte Cristo) recounted in over-the-top operatic form. It relies on a few strong coincidences conveniently linking all characters and some of its narrative elements are not entirely valid. (1) In an important scene, the young and beautiful Johanna, Turpin’s captive and Anthony’s budding love interest, throws a key to our lad from her bedroom window while the jealous Turpin, watching her from a keyhole, chooses not to intervene. Logically, you’d expect a stiffer reaction from this ogre of a man if you consider how he repelled Anthony in an earlier encounter; in his place, at the very least, I would have barged into the room to scold Johanna and threaten Anthony from the window. While we’re at it, how did Johanna ever get her hands on a house key with a monster like Turpin hovering around her? (2) If you adhere to the story, Sweeney should be at least fourteen years older than Pirelli but, notwithstanding Sweeney’s lock of white hair, I never felt that the age difference was that wide on screen. (3) Tobias’ fond reminiscences about Pirelli seem exaggerated when you consider how the Italian barber mistreated him; similarly, the boy’s initial suspicions about Sweeney are not really explained. (4) I had difficulty believing that a vulnerable little boy like Tobias would commit the final act of violence in the story but, of course, it had to be committed by one of the characters and there weren’t many left at that point. I’ll admit that the youngster had stated earlier that he would do anything for Mrs. Lovett… but he had also suggested calling the police. Why, then, did he take matters into his own hands? For his sake, we’ll simply assume that he was driven by his will to survive… or poisoned by all those pies he ate. (5) Lastly, the movie is somewhat disingenuous about the message it wants to convey. By counterbalancing an ironic and morally acceptable conclusion with several detailed depictions of the same slaughterous act, it manages to trivialize (or even glorify) violence by hinting that slitting throats may be horrendous but is also very cool. Personally, I don’t consider myself an innocent and I don’t object to multiple deaths in a work of art but, if you compare this production with Franco Zeffirelli’s HAMLET for example, you’ll see how better things can be when less emphasis is put on bloodshed. For all these reasons, I cannot give SWEENEY TODD as high a mark as I would have liked but, in its present state, it does remain a solid film.

Enough said! I’m sure you get the picture… and you may readily see it. Just don’t take it too seriously. It’s not worth busting an artery the next time you see a razor.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Dangerous Liaisons



Genre: historical drama of manners
With: Glenn Close, John Malkovich, Michelle Pfeiffer
Director: Stephen Frears
Release: 1988
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures, Lorimar Film Entertainment, NFH Ltd. – Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution
Rating: R
MBiS score: 8.7/10


QuickView


Story-line: in old-time France, the aristocratic and redoubtable Madame de Merteuil plots revenge on a former lover.
Pluses: formidable acting, striking aesthetics, great direction, outstanding production values.
Minuses: none whatsoever.
Comments: like its rival VALMONT (another fine film on the same subject), this heavy-duty drama about love and cruelty among the rich and supposedly noble is based on a scandalous epistolary novel written in 1782 (!) by Choderlos de Laclos. This powerful film is proof positive that a great story never ages. A must for movie buffs.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Noces rouges (Les)



English titles: Blood Wedding, Red Wedding, Wedding in Blood
Genre: matrimonial drama
Director: Claude Chabrol
Release: 1970
Studio: Films la Boétie, Canaria Films – Films la Boétie, CIC Productions
Rating: PG
MBiS score: 8.0/10


Let’s Play Adultery!


When political advisor Pierre Maury (Michel Piccoli) is hired by Paul Delamare (Claude Piéplu) to seal his bid for municipal office, he is quick to notice Lucienne Delamare (Stéphane Audran), Paul’s outgoing and sexy wife. For Pierre, who leads a joyless existence with Clothilde (Clothilde Joano), a depressed and sickly woman, Lucienne’s presence is both a blessing and a curse. What doth man do when the weight of duty and the rush of passion tear equally at his heart?

Claude Chabrol, an accomplished French director, makes fine dramas that unfold leisurely enough but never lack substance. LES NOCES ROUGES is a typically serious Chabrol but it also distinguishes itself from most films in this genre with its healthy dose of humour. In Pierre and Lucienne’s case, there is no guilt in hanky-panky… it’s all glee and boisterous fun. You’ll crack up, I’m sure, when you see the shenanigans these two perpetrate in the name of love. And when their affair leads to trouble, as often happens in these matters, Chabrol’s film is no less watchable for it.

Frankly, I couldn’t imagine better casting anywhere for a story such as this. Michel Piccoli, one of the wiliest thespians around, plays Pierre as an outwardly responsible man, all business and decorum, who turns into a lusting animal whenever Lucienne is close and willing. As for Stéphane Audran, she matches Piccoli’s performance with her own brand of spunk; there is one trick she does on him during an outdoor scene that sure looks like a practical joke and, if you catch it, you’ll notice Piccoli twitching with surprise. In a supporting role, Claude Piéplu doesn’t squander his chances either and his biting repartees are also worth a laugh or two. In other respects, LES NOCES ROUGES is a sober and solid production. The story-line, based on real-life events, deliberately leaves a couple of open questions but ends on a stunner, one last statement by Pierre that you will find both puzzling and disarmingly candid.

Let’s settle one more point. Should you see LES NOCES ROUGES, another in a long line of flicks showcasing the joys and perils of adultery? Yes, if you don’t mind me saying so. This excellent French film delivers enough drama, hijinks and mystery to please any movie buff.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Music of Chance (The)



Genre: drama and suspense
With: Mandy Patinkin, James Spader, M. Emmet Walsh
Director: Philip Haas
Release: 1993
Studio: By Chance Productions, American Playhouse, IRS Media – IRS Releasing
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.9/10


QuickView


Story-line: for Jim Nashe and Jack Pozzi, getting involved in a poker game seemed like a very good idea…
Pluses: fine acting (from the good guys and the bad guys), a devilish story-line, solid direction, great songs by Richard Strauss.
Minuses: don’t pick this one if you crave for a feel-good movie.
Comments: THE MUSIC OF CHANCE may be a modest production but its brutality will leave you dumbfounded. It’s like a living nightmare.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved

Monday, May 10, 2010

Gone Baby Gone



Genre: crime drama
Director: Ben Affleck
Release: 2007
Studio: Touchstone Pictures, Miramax Films et al. – Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, Miramax Films
Rating: R
MBiS score: 7.2/10


The More You See, The More It Hurts


Boston, Massachusetts. Patrick Kenzie (Casey Affleck) and his girlfriend Angie Gennaro (Michelle Monaghan), who are partners in a small detective agency, are approached by members of the McCready family to investigate the disappearance of little Amanda (Madeline O'Brien), a four-year-old girl. Although they are not ideally qualified for the job and Amanda’s case is already investigated by the police, Patrick and Angie accept to do their part for the McCreadys… not knowing what they’re getting into. With Amy Ryan (Helene McCready, Amanda’s mother), Titus Welliver (Lionel McCready), Amy Madigan (Bea McCready), Ed Harris (Remy Bressant), Morgan Freeman (Jack Doyle), John Ashton (Nick Poole), Mark Margolis (Leon Trett), Michael Kenneth Williams (Devin), Edi Gathegi (Cheese Jean-Baptiste) and Matthew Maher (Corwin Earle).

It’s quite easy to review a movie you have loved, especially when every critic out there agrees with you, but you can’t help second-guessing yourself when a film lauded by a large majority has left you with the blahs. Such is my frame of mind – a mixture of respect, disappointment and doubt – as I write about GONE BABY GONE, a drama that shows clear kinship with MYSTIC RIVER but cannot equal, at least in my book, Clint Eastwood’s superlative work. For better or for worse, here are my thoughts.

In Ben Affleck’s brave and competent oeuvre, there are things I admired and others that annoyed me. On the positive side, GONE BABY GONE carries a gritty, authentic feel steeped in working-class mores, dubious behaviour and deep mistrust for the police. As the eloquent and glamourless first scenes plainly show, people in Patrick Kenzie’s part of town can only survive if they acquire a steel-like toughness that locks in most human emotions; these are ordinary folk with little to hope for except arduous labour, fleeting love, habitual boredom and the temptations of crime, petty or otherwise. In such a milieu, investigating a kidnapping is no small task even for an insider: there will always be hidden facts to uncover, surprises to fathom, compromises to make. On this account, Affleck’s production clearly succeeds as a realistic representation of grim lives even if its effectiveness is marred by distant camera work early on in the narrative. Those few scenes filmed from afar don’t last long but they bothered me nevertheless.

GONE BABY GONE is well-stocked in acting talent but Casey Affleck stands out. He fully convinced me with his low-key portrayal of Patrick Kenzie, a man who has not turned his back on the past; there is something in this actor’s broken voice and soft delivery that reminds me of Alan Arkin’s supple playing. As for Michelle Monaghan, I have reservations not about her performance but about her inconsistent character; at times, Angie Gennaro dreads what lies ahead as would any tender-hearted woman but, in others, she acts with inexplicable calmness in the face of imminent danger or even demonstrates patent ruthlessness. In supporting roles, Amy Ryan offered a fine interpretation, Edi Gathegi also; Ed Harris and Morgan Freeman in no way tarnished their sterling reputations.

As for the movie’s story-line, it is irreproachable – up to a point. The action develops slowly but gathers noticeable momentum as the investigation moves along. There are turns and complications, violent emotional setbacks (as in BLACK RAIN, I thought), genuine mystery and suspense. Truly, the screenplay goes to great lengths to offer something different and, while things looked quite murky midway, I never doubted that an answer would emerge. When it did, however, I was simply unable to accept it. Here’s why. Warning – spoilers ahead! (1) When you think about it, the motive for the kidnapping was not very sound. Consider the people who stood to benefit from the crime: a former police officer (of all people!) and his faithful wife, senior citizens to boot. They will be in their eighties by the time Amanda comes out of adolescence! As justification, it is stated that the couple had lost a little girl many years ago… but why have they waited this long before filling the void in their lives? With so many orphans stranded in our world, wouldn’t legal adoption make more sense than stealing a child, especially for a retired policeman? Was it all worth the risks involved? Could this twisted man turn into a ‘serial adopter’ if left unaccountable? And since when has the police substituted itself for social services in order to remove a child from her mother’s care? (2) On another level, the targeting of Amanda resulted from actions and decisions that were not entirely plausible. Why was she picked, especially when the kidnappers knew about her mother’s erratic lifestyle, drug connections and shady relations? Wouldn’t a policeman be attracted to a child with a healthier background? This sort of kidnapping, I guess, would seem more believable in a small town – where some people are well-connected and freely put their fingers where they shouldn’t – but to see it happen in a major city may be a stretch. And how do you figure out Amanda’s new life? Has she been brainwashed into accepting her forced adoption? How was it explained to her? Doesn’t she still remember Mommy? (3) Seen as a whole, the machinations required to cover up the kidnapping go beyond the mandatory ‘suspension of disbelief’. You have lies, intimidation, the police incidentally suspecting known child molesters for the kidnapping, an elaborate exchange taking place in a remote area, drug traffickers being murdered, a botched raid and a police detective disguised as a robber who barges into a watering hole to threaten his contact in front of the bartender and several witnesses… in other words, a smorgasbord for conspiracy fans. Would you go this far for a little girl? I sure wouldn’t… and I can only surmise that the story was conceived in such a way that Amanda would be spared. Because of this emphasis on suspense over logic, the story-line thus failed entirely for me despite its other qualities and treasurable little denouement. Accordingly, I don’t see how I can award this film (without regard to Dennis Lehane’s book on the subject) anything more than a very low passing grade.

In conclusion, is GONE BABY GONE worth your precious time? Certainly if you’re in the mood for a robust and gruelling film that is all guts and messy situations and if you’re ready to overlook the snags in its story-line. As for me, you know where I stand. To quote Brando’s famous line in ON THE WATERFRONT, this film ‘could have been a contender’ but its punch was deadened by one twist too many. Nevertheless, it goes the distance like a granite-jawed brawler bent on punishing everyone - its characters, viewers and even this would-be reviewer - in the process. I hope you’ll understand.


MBiS

© 2010 – All rights reserved